Simulating the value of collaboration in multi-actor conservation planning

被引:12
|
作者
Gordon, Ascelin [1 ]
Bastin, Lucy [2 ]
Langford, William T. [1 ]
Lechner, Alex M. [1 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Studies Social Sci & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic conservation planning; Reserve design; Marxan; Multi-actor; Conservation investment; Game theory; PRIORITIES; SELECTION; REGIONS; GAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The loss of habitat and biodiversity worldwide has led to considerable resources being spent on conservation interventions. Prioritising these actions is challenging due to the complexity of the problem and because there can be multiple actors undertaking conservation actions, often with divergent or partially overlapping objectives. We explore this issue with a simulation study involving two agents sequentially purchasing land for the conservation of multiple species using three scenarios comprising either divergent or partially overlapping objectives between the agents. The first scenario investigates the situation where both agents are targeting different sets of threatened species. The second and third scenarios represent a case where a government agency attempts to implement a complementary conservation network representing 200 species, while a non-government organisation is focused on achieving additional protection for the ten rarest species. Simulated input data was generated using distributions taken from real data to model the cost of parcels, and the rarity and co-occurrence of species. We investigated three types of collaborative interactions between agents: acting in isolation, sharing information and pooling resources with the third option resulting in the agents combining their resources and effectively acting as a single entity. In each scenario we determine the cost savings when an agent moves from acting in isolation to either sharing information or pooling resources with the other agent. The model demonstrates how the value of collaboration can vary significantly in different situations. In most cases, collaborating would have associated costs and these costs need to be weighed against the potential benefits from collaboration. Our model demonstrates a method for determining the range of costs that would result in collaboration providing an efficient use of scarce conservation resources. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-actor approaches to implement cooperative strategies and value chains based on sustainability
    Contini, Caterina
    Marotta, Giuseppe
    Torquati, Biancamaria
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [22] Decision Making and Value Realization in Multi-Actor e-Government Contexts
    Sundberg, Leif
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, 2016, 23 : 147 - 154
  • [23] Multi-actor mechanism for actor-critic reinforcement learning
    Li, Lin
    Li, Yuze
    Wei, Wei
    Zhang, Yujia
    Liang, Jiye
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 647
  • [24] Beyond Model UN: Simulating Multi-Level, Multi-Actor Diplomacy Using the Millennium Development Goals
    Crossley-Frolick, Katy A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 11 (02) : 184 - 201
  • [25] Innovation networks for social impact: An empirical study on multi-actor collaboration in projects for smart cities
    Leite, Emilene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 139 : 325 - 337
  • [26] Regional collaboration for the sustainable development goals: Experiences from developing a multi-actor platform in Sweden
    Krantz, Venus
    Gustafsson, Sara
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (06) : 4007 - 4018
  • [27] Conceptualizing customer experience in multi-actor platforms
    Dhrithi Mahadevan
    G. Shainesh
    [J]. AMS Review, 2024, 14 (1-2) : 83 - 103
  • [28] A Relational Approach to Leadership for Multi-Actor Governance
    Craps, Marc
    Vermeesch, Inge
    Dewulf, Art
    Sips, Koen
    Termeer, Katrien
    Bouwen, Rene
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [29] Management in Networks: On Multi-Actor Decision Making
    Kalu, Kalu N.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [30] The multi-actor perspective of engagement on social media
    Shawky, Sara
    Kubacki, Krzysztof
    Dietrich, Timo
    Weaven, Scott
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 64 (01) : 19 - 37