Implications of the theory of autopoiesis for the discipline and practice of information systems

被引:0
|
作者
Beeson, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Fac Comp Studies & Math, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The theory of autopoiesis, developed in biology by Maturana and Varela, deprives information of any significant role in self-producing systems, because such systems are organizationally closed After exploring the rejection of the notion of information, and laying out the main tenets of the theory, this paper considers some of the implications of the theoretical position for the discipline and practice of information systems (IS). The chief consequence is to shift focus from abstraction, representation, and design toward cooperation and use. The paper goes on to discuss different approaches to applying the theory of autopoiesis in IS. Some benefit might, for instance, be had from using the ideas as metaphors. The role of information is seen to he restored in Luhmann's development of an autopoietic theory for social systems. A more radical use of the theory in IS would be to develop the basic ontology proposed by Maturana and Varela. A start on this is made from a phenomenological perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 332
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Autopoiesis, Systems Thinking and Systemic Practice: The Contribution of Francisco Varela
    Paucar-Caceres, Alberto
    Harnden, Roger
    Reichel, Andre
    [J]. SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2011, 28 (06) : 571 - 574
  • [22] Information systems - A cyborg discipline?
    Ramage, M
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH: RELEVANT THEORY AND INFORMED PRACTICE, 2004, : 71 - 81
  • [23] Is information systems a reference discipline?
    Department of Business Information Systems, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, United States
    [J]. 1600, 114-118 (2006):
  • [24] Is information systems a reference discipline?
    Katerattanakul, P
    Han, B
    Rea, A
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2006, 49 (05) : 114 - 118
  • [25] Is information systems a reference discipline?
    Nerur, Sridhar P.
    Balijepally, Venugopal
    Mahapatra, RadhaKanta
    Mangalaraj, George
    [J]. Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 1600, (203):
  • [26] Information systems as a reference discipline
    Baskerville, RL
    Myers, MD
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2002, 26 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [27] Systems thinking in the theory and practice of strategic information systems planning
    Brown, I
    [J]. SYSTEMS THEORY AND PRACTICE IN THE KNOWLEDGE AGE, 2002, : 349 - 356
  • [28] OFFSHORING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS DISCIPLINE: WHERE PERCEPTION MEETS REALITY
    Hirschheim, Rudy
    Loebbecke, Claudia
    Newman, Mike
    Valor, Josep
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 20 : 824 - 835
  • [29] The Relationship between Autopoiesis Theory and Biosemiotics: On Philosophical Suppositions as Bases for a New Information Theory
    Nishida, Yohei
    [J]. TRIPLEC-COMMUNICATION CAPITALISM & CRITIQUE, 2011, 9 (02): : 424 - 433
  • [30] Discipline and practice: The (ir)resistibility of theory
    Banks, Anthony
    [J]. ANGLIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENGLISCHE PHILOLOGIE, 2005, 123 (03): : 555 - 557