Implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy to the prostate bed: Dosimetric study and early clinical results

被引:3
|
作者
Riou, Olivier [1 ]
Laliberte, Benoit [2 ]
Azria, David [1 ]
Menkarios, Cathy [2 ]
Moscardo, Carmen Llacer [1 ]
Dubois, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Ailleres, Norbert [1 ]
Fenoglietto, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] CRLC Val dAurelle Paul Lamarque, Dept Cancerol Radiotherapie, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Dept Radiooncol, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
关键词
Postoperative; Prostate cancer; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Conformal radiotherapy; Toxicity; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; TARGET VOLUME; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; PHASE-III; CANCER; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2012.09.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Salvage intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the prostate bed has hardly been studied so far. We present here a feasibility study and early clinical results for 10 patients. These patients were selected on the basis of having either a biochemical relapse or high risk histology after prostatectomy. They were treated using "sliding-window" IMRT to 68 Gy in 34 fractions. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans were generated using the same planning computed tomography data set. Dose coverage of planning target volumes (PTVs) and of organs-at-risk (OAR, namely: rectum, bladder, and femoral heads) were compared. Acute toxicity and chronic toxicity were measured using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 scale. IMRT significantly reduces the dose above the prescription dose given to the PTV1 (mean dose: IMRT 67.2 Gy vs 3D-CRT 67.7 Gy (p = 0.0137)), without altering dose coverage for P1'V2 (mean dose: IMRT 68.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 68.0 Gy (p = 0.3750)). Doses to OAR were lower with IMRT and differences were statistically significant (mean dose: IMRT 51.4 Gy vs 3D-CRT 56.6 Gy for rectum (p = 0.002), IMRT 45.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 53.1 Gy for bladder (p = 0.002), and IMRT 26.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 28.4 Gy for femoral heads (p = 0.0059)). There was no acute or chronic genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity >1 with a median follow-up of 38 months. IMRT to the prostatic fossa is feasible and reduces dose to OAR, with consequential limited toxicity. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Ren, Wenting
    Sun, Chao
    Lu, Ningning
    Xu, Yingjie
    Han, Fei
    Liu, Yue Ping
    Dai, Jianrong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 254 - 262
  • [32] Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator widths in the treatment of prostate cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Wang, L
    Jacob, R
    Movsas, B
    Chen, L
    Fourkal, E
    Ma, C
    Pollack, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1405 - 1405
  • [33] Clinical implementation of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Dosimetric aspects and initial experience
    Sivakumar, S. S.
    Krishnamurthy, K.
    Davis, C. A.
    Ravichandran, R.
    Kannadhasan, S.
    Biunkumar, J. P.
    El Ghamrawy, Kamal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 33 (02) : 64 - 71
  • [34] Clinical and physical quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Boehmer, D
    Bohsung, J
    Eichwurzel, I
    Moys, A
    Budach, V
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 71 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [35] 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Dosimetric and radiobiologic analysis
    Bhardwaj, A. K.
    Kehwar, T. S.
    Chakarvarti, S. K.
    Oinam, A. S.
    Sharma, S. C.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [36] Clinical Toxicities and Dosimetric Parameters after Whole-Pelvis versus Prostate Bed-only Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Deville, C.
    Vapiwala, N.
    Lin, H.
    Hwang, W.
    Tochner, Z.
    Both, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S364 - S364
  • [37] Comparative dosimetric analysis of intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Ali, M. Athar
    Babaiah, M.
    George, G.
    Madhusudhan, N.
    Ramalingam, K.
    Kumar, S. Ashok
    Karthikeyan, K.
    Anantharaman, A.
    Shanu, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S188 - S188
  • [38] Implementing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy: Challenges and opportunities in the UK
    Beardmore, Charlotte A.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2011, 17 (01) : 4 - 5
  • [39] Dosimetric Properties of Detectors for Quality Control of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Plaude, S.
    Popov, S.
    Miller, A.
    Dekhtyar, Y.
    [J]. 14TH NORDIC-BALTIC CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 20 : 578 - +
  • [40] Dosimetric consequences of a translational isocenter correction based on image guidance for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of the prostate
    Wertz, H.
    Lohr, F.
    Dobler, B.
    Mai, S.
    Welzel, G.
    Boda-Heggemann, J.
    Wenz, F.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (18): : 5655 - 5665