Implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy to the prostate bed: Dosimetric study and early clinical results

被引:3
|
作者
Riou, Olivier [1 ]
Laliberte, Benoit [2 ]
Azria, David [1 ]
Menkarios, Cathy [2 ]
Moscardo, Carmen Llacer [1 ]
Dubois, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Ailleres, Norbert [1 ]
Fenoglietto, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] CRLC Val dAurelle Paul Lamarque, Dept Cancerol Radiotherapie, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Dept Radiooncol, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
关键词
Postoperative; Prostate cancer; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Conformal radiotherapy; Toxicity; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; TARGET VOLUME; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; PHASE-III; CANCER; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2012.09.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Salvage intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the prostate bed has hardly been studied so far. We present here a feasibility study and early clinical results for 10 patients. These patients were selected on the basis of having either a biochemical relapse or high risk histology after prostatectomy. They were treated using "sliding-window" IMRT to 68 Gy in 34 fractions. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans were generated using the same planning computed tomography data set. Dose coverage of planning target volumes (PTVs) and of organs-at-risk (OAR, namely: rectum, bladder, and femoral heads) were compared. Acute toxicity and chronic toxicity were measured using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 scale. IMRT significantly reduces the dose above the prescription dose given to the PTV1 (mean dose: IMRT 67.2 Gy vs 3D-CRT 67.7 Gy (p = 0.0137)), without altering dose coverage for P1'V2 (mean dose: IMRT 68.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 68.0 Gy (p = 0.3750)). Doses to OAR were lower with IMRT and differences were statistically significant (mean dose: IMRT 51.4 Gy vs 3D-CRT 56.6 Gy for rectum (p = 0.002), IMRT 45.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 53.1 Gy for bladder (p = 0.002), and IMRT 26.1 Gy vs 3D-CRT 28.4 Gy for femoral heads (p = 0.0059)). There was no acute or chronic genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity >1 with a median follow-up of 38 months. IMRT to the prostatic fossa is feasible and reduces dose to OAR, with consequential limited toxicity. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric and clinical results
    Bae, Sun Hyun
    Jang, Won Il
    Park, Hee Chul
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (35) : 59965 - 59976
  • [2] Intensity modulated radiotherapy in high grade gliomas: Clinical and dosimetric results.
    Narayana, A
    Yamada, J
    Hunt, M
    Shah, P
    Gutin, P
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 115S - 115S
  • [3] Clinical Outcomes of Proton Radiotherapy for Pediatric Bladder/Prostate Rhabdomyosarcoma and a Dosimetric Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Cotter, S. E.
    Herrup, D. A.
    Adams, J.
    Friedmann, A. M.
    MacDonald, S. M.
    Chen, Y. L.
    Tarbell, N. J.
    Yock, T. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S511 - S511
  • [4] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of vulvar carcinoma: A comparative dosimetric study with early clinical outcome
    Beriwal, S
    Heron, D
    Kim, H
    King, G
    Shogun, J
    Gerszten, K
    Lee, J
    Comerci, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S218 - S218
  • [5] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of vulvar carcinoma: A comparative dosimetric study with early clinical outcome
    Beriwal, S
    Heron, DE
    Kim, H
    King, G
    Shogan, J
    Bahri, S
    Gerszten, K
    Lee, J
    Kelley, J
    Edwards, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (05): : 1395 - 1400
  • [6] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in high-grade gliomas: Clinical and dosimetric results
    Narayana, A
    Yamada, J
    Berry, S
    Shah, P
    Hunt, M
    Gutin, PH
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (03): : 892 - 897
  • [7] BENCHMARKING DOSIMETRIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PROSTATE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
    Senthi, Sashendra
    Gill, Suki S.
    Haworth, Annette
    Kron, Tomas
    Cramb, Jim
    Rolfo, Aldo
    Thomas, Jessica
    Duchesne, Gillian M.
    Hamilton, Christopher H.
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    Bowden, Patrick
    Foroudi, Farshad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 998 - 1005
  • [8] Prostate Bed Motion during Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment
    Klayton, T. L.
    Price, R.
    Buyyounouski, M. K.
    Sobczak, M.
    Greenberg, R. E.
    Li, J.
    Kutikov, A.
    Horwitz, E. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S101 - S101
  • [9] Clinical and dosimetric implications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage glottic carcinoma
    Ward, Matthew Christopher
    Pham, Yvonne D.
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    Zakem, Sara J.
    Murray, Eric
    Greskovich, John F.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2016, 41 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [10] DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGIC COMPARISON OF 3D CONFORMAL VERSUS INTENSITY MODULATED PLANNING TECHNIQUES FOR PROSTATE BED RADIOTHERAPY
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    Das, Shiva
    Temple, Kathy
    Bynum, Sigrun
    Catalano, Suzanne
    Koontz, Jason I.
    Montana, Gustavo S.
    Oleson, James R.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (03) : 256 - 260