INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING USING A COMBINED FACTOR ANALYSIS AND ENTROPY-BASED TOPSIS MODEL

被引:32
|
作者
Hsu, Li-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Ling Tung Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 40852, Taiwan
关键词
decision making; financial performance evaluation; RAROC; TOPSIS; factor analysis; entropy weight; opto-electronic companies; EVALUATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; CONSTRUCTION; SELECTION; ALTERNATIVES; RISK; AHP; MULTIMOORA; ENTERPRISE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3846/16111699.2011.633098
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Traditionally, the return on assets and the return on equity are used as the criteria in the evaluation of financial performance, while risk considerations are ignored. Therefore, this study combined financial ratio variables and the RAROC (risk-adjusted rate of return on capital) as the evaluation criteria and developed a financial performance evaluation model. The proposed evaluation model combines factor analysis with entropy weight and the TOPSIS (technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution) to evaluate the financial performance of Taiwan's 50 listed opto-electronic companies. Finally, Spearman's and Kendall's rank correlations are used to verify that there is no significant difference between the 2007 and 2008 rankings of the companies. The empirical results show the financial performance rankings of the companies before and after the global financial turmoil. These findings not only help investors making investment decisions, but also can help managers make decisions to improve their company's financial performance.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 466
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A hybrid entropy-based economic evaluation of hydrogen generation techniques using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Alamri, Faten S.
    Saeed, Muhammad Haris
    Saeed, Muhammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 49 : 711 - 723
  • [32] Business investment decision-making based on mathematical model and risk analysis
    Qi, Ruijuan
    Liu, Chang
    Zhang, Qiwen
    Gu, Lingzi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2024, 46 (03) : 5677 - 5693
  • [33] MULTI FACTOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN THE INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING
    Dluhosova, Dana
    Richtarova, Dagmar
    Culik, Miroslav
    [J]. METAL 2011: 20TH ANNIVERSARY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS, 2011, : 1192 - 1200
  • [34] An entropy model on group decision-making for real estate investment items
    Zhu, BZ
    Lin, JA
    [J]. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 1163 - 1165
  • [35] Entropy-based fuzzy SWOT decision-making for condition assessment of airfield pavements
    Vyas, Vidhi
    Singh, Ajit Pratap
    Srivastava, Anshuman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2021, 22 (10) : 1226 - 1237
  • [36] Post factum analysis in TOPSIS based decision making method
    Dutta, Bapi
    Singha, Tanima
    Goh, Mark
    Lamata, Maria Teresa
    Verdegay, Jose-Luis
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 138
  • [37] Web Attack Detection using Entropy-based Analysis
    Threepak, T.
    Watcharapupong, A.
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2014), 2014, : 244 - 247
  • [38] An integrated TOPSIS–ORESTE-based decision-making framework for new energy investment assessment with cloud model
    Zhengmin Liu
    Xinya Wang
    Wenxin Wang
    Di Wang
    Peide Liu
    [J]. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2022, 41
  • [39] An integrated TOPSIS-ORESTE-based decision-making framework for new energy investment assessment with cloud model
    Liu, Zhengmin
    Wang, Xinya
    Wang, Wenxin
    Wang, Di
    Liu, Peide
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2022, 41 (01):
  • [40] Clean energy selection for sustainable development by using entropy-based decision model with hesitant fuzzy information
    Krishankumar, Raghunathan
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Cavallaro, Fausto
    Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (28) : 42973 - 42990