Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

被引:318
|
作者
Ypenburg, Claudia [1 ]
van Bommel, Rutger J. [1 ]
Delgado, Victoria [1 ]
Mollema, Sjoerd A. [1 ]
Bleeker, Gabe B. [1 ]
Boersma, Eric [2 ]
Schalij, Martin J. [1 ]
Bax, Jeroen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
resynchronization therapy; lead position; echocardiography; heart failure;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 +/- 83 ml to 134 +/- 71 ml, p < 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 +/- 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1402 -9) (C) 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1402 / 1409
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Yu, CM
    Bleeker, GB
    Fung, JWH
    Schalij, MJ
    Zhang, Q
    van der Wall, EE
    Chan, YS
    Kong, SL
    Bax, JJ
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (11) : 1580 - 1586
  • [2] LEFT VENTRICULAR REVERSE REMODELING AFTER UPGRADE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
    Khidir, Mand
    Hoke, Ulas
    Regeer, Madelien
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen
    Delgado, Victoria
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A915 - A915
  • [3] The quest for an optimal left ventricular lead position for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Burri, Haran
    HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (11) : 1293 - 1294
  • [4] Left ventricular regional remodeling and lead position during cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Sommer, Anders
    Fyenbo, Daniel B.
    Norgaard, Bjarne L.
    Gerdes, Christian
    Jensen, Jesper Moller
    Jensen, Henrik Kjaerulf
    Kristensen, Jens
    Nielsen, Jens C.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2018, 15 (10) : 1542 - 1549
  • [5] QRS Remodeling to Predict Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Van Der Bijl, Pieter
    Delgado, Victoria
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (05) : 600 - 601
  • [6] Left atrial reverse remodeling predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Sjoerd Bouwmeester
    Thomas P. Mast
    Daniëlle C. J. Keulards
    Anouk G. W. de Lepper
    Ingeborg H. F. Herold
    Lukas R. Dekker
    Frits W. Prinzen
    Patrick Houthuizen
    Journal of Echocardiography, 2022, 20 : 115 - 123
  • [7] Influence of lead position on reverse remodeling and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ypenburg, C.
    Van Bommel, R. J.
    Delgado, V.
    Mollema, S. A.
    Bleeker, G. B.
    Boersma, E.
    Schalij, M. J.
    Bax, J. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 811 - 811
  • [8] Left atrial reverse remodeling predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bouwmeester, Sjoerd
    Mast, Thomas P.
    Keulards, Danielle C. J.
    de Lepper, Anouk G. W.
    Herold, Ingeborg H. F.
    Dekker, Lukas R.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Houthuizen, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2022, 20 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [9] Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts right ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bleeker, GB
    Schalij, MJ
    Nihoyannopoulos, P
    Steendijk, P
    Molhoek, SG
    van Erven, L
    Bootsma, M
    Holman, ER
    van der Wall, EE
    Bax, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (12) : 2264 - 2269
  • [10] Relation of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy to left ventricular reverse remodeling and to diastolic dyssynchrony
    Rovner, Aleksandr
    de las Fuentes, Lisa
    Faddis, Mitchell N.
    Gleva, Marye J.
    Davila-Roman, Victor G.
    Waggoner, Alan D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (02): : 239 - 241