Clinical efficacy of a next-generation sequencing gene panel for primary immunodeficiency diagnostics

被引:49
|
作者
Rae, W. [1 ,2 ]
Ward, D. [3 ]
Mattocks, C. [3 ]
Pengelly, R. J. [4 ]
Eren, E. [1 ]
Patel, S. V. [5 ]
Faust, S. N. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Hunt, D. [6 ]
Williams, A. P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Dept Immunol, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Southampton Natl Inst Hlth Res Clin Res Facil, Mail Point 218,C Level,Tremona Rd, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Wessex Invest Sci Hub Lab, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Childrens Hosp Southampton, Paediat Immunol & Infect Dis, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Wessex Clin Genet Serv, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
clinical diagnostics; human phenotype ontology; next-generation sequencing; primary immunodeficiency; COMMON VARIABLE IMMUNODEFICIENCY; 3-KINASE DELTA SYNDROME; OF-FUNCTION MUTATIONS; IMMUNE DYSREGULATION; MYCOBACTERIAL INFECTION; MEDICAL GENETICS; WHOLE-EXOME; VARIANTS; DEFICIENCY; PHENOTYPE;
D O I
10.1111/cge.13163
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are rare monogenic inborn errors of immunity that result in impairment of functions of the human immune system. PIDs have a broad phenotype with increased morbidity and mortality, and treatment choices are often complex. With increased accessibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the rate of discovery of genetic causes for PID has increased exponentially. Identification of an underlying monogenic diagnosis provides important clinical benefits for patients with the potential to alter treatments, facilitate genetic counselling, and pre-implantation diagnostics. We investigated a NGS PID panel of 242 genes within clinical care across a range of PID phenotypes. We also evaluated Phenomizer to predict causal genes from human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms. Twenty-seven participants were recruited, and a total of 15 reportable variants were identified in 48% (13/27) of the participants. The panel results had implications for treatment in 37% (10/27) of participants. Phenomizer identified the genes harbouring variants from HPO terms in 33% (9/27) of participants. This study shows the clinical efficacy that genetic testing has in the care of PID. However, it also highlights some of the disadvantages of gene panels in the rapidly moving field of PID genomics and current challenges in HPO term assignment for PID.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Application of Next-generation Sequencing in Clinical Molecular Diagnostics
    Seifi, Morteza
    Ghasemi, Asghar
    Raeisi, Sina
    Heidarzadeh, Siamak
    [J]. BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 60
  • [12] Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical cancer diagnostics
    Chan, Maurice
    Lee, Charlie W-H
    Wu, Mengchu
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 13 (07) : 647 - 650
  • [13] A decade of next-generation sequencing in genodermatoses: the impact on gene discovery and clinical diagnostics
    Chiu, F. P. -C.
    Doolan, B. J.
    McGrath, J. A.
    Onoufriadis, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 184 (04) : 606 - 616
  • [14] Rapid molecular diagnostics of severe primary immunodeficiency determined by using targeted next-generation sequencing
    Yu, Hui
    Zhang, Victor Wei
    Stray-Pedersen, Asbjorg
    Hanson, Imelda Celine
    Forbes, Lisa R.
    de la Morena, M. Teresa
    Chinn, Ivan K.
    Gorman, Elizabeth
    Mendelsohn, Nancy J.
    Pozos, Tamara
    Wiszniewski, Wojciech
    Nicholas, Sarah K.
    Yates, Anne B.
    Moore, Lindsey E.
    Berge, Knut Erik
    Sorte, Hanne
    Bayer, Diana K.
    ALZahrani, Daifulah
    Geha, Raif S.
    Feng, Yanming
    Wang, Guoli
    Orange, Jordan S.
    Lupski, James R.
    Wang, Jing
    Wong, Lee-Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 138 (04) : 1142 - +
  • [15] Clinical utility of a 377 gene custom next-generation sequencing epilepsy panel
    Jen Bevilacqua
    Andrew Hesse
    Brian Cormier
    Jennifer Davey
    Devanshi Patel
    Kritika Shankar
    Honey V. Reddi
    [J]. Journal of Genetics, 2017, 96 : 681 - 685
  • [16] Clinical impact of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel for autoinflammation and vasculitis
    Omoyinmi, Ebun
    Standing, Ariane
    Keylock, Annette
    Price-Kuehne, Fiona
    Gomes, Sonia Melo
    Rowczenio, Dorota
    Nanthapisal, Sira
    Cullup, Thomas
    Nyanhete, Rodney
    Ashton, Emma
    Murphy, Claire
    Clarke, Megan
    Ahlfors, Helena
    Jenkins, Lucy
    Gilmour, Kimberly
    Eleftheriou, Despina
    Lachmann, Helen J.
    Hawkins, Philip N.
    Klein, Nigel
    Brogan, Paul A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [17] Clinical utility of a 377 gene custom next-generation sequencing epilepsy panel
    Bevilacqua, Jen
    Hesse, Andrew
    Cormier, Brian
    Davey, Jennifer
    Patel, Devanshi
    Shankar, Kritika
    Reddi, Honey V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2017, 96 (04) : 681 - 685
  • [18] Next-Generation Diagnostics: Gene Panel, Exome, or Whole Genome?
    Sun, Yu
    Ruivenkamp, Claudia A. L.
    Hoffer, Mariette J. V.
    Vrijenhoek, Terry
    Kriek, Marjolein
    van Asperen, Christi J.
    den Dunnen, Johan T.
    Santen, Gijs W. E.
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2015, 36 (06) : 648 - 655
  • [19] Targeted next-generation sequencing using a multigene panel in myeloid neoplasms: Implementation in clinical diagnostics
    Maes, B.
    Willemse, J.
    Broekmans, A.
    Smets, R.
    Cruys, B.
    Put, N.
    Madoe, V.
    Janssen, M.
    Soepenberg, O.
    Bries, G.
    Vrelust, I.
    Achten, R.
    Van Pelt, K.
    Buve, K.
    Theunissen, K.
    Peeters, V.
    Froyen, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 39 (06) : 604 - 612
  • [20] Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnostics
    Corless, Christopher L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 18 (06): : 813 - 816