Clinical efficacy of a next-generation sequencing gene panel for primary immunodeficiency diagnostics

被引:49
|
作者
Rae, W. [1 ,2 ]
Ward, D. [3 ]
Mattocks, C. [3 ]
Pengelly, R. J. [4 ]
Eren, E. [1 ]
Patel, S. V. [5 ]
Faust, S. N. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Hunt, D. [6 ]
Williams, A. P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Dept Immunol, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Southampton Natl Inst Hlth Res Clin Res Facil, Mail Point 218,C Level,Tremona Rd, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Wessex Invest Sci Hub Lab, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Childrens Hosp Southampton, Paediat Immunol & Infect Dis, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Hosp Southampton NHSFT, Wessex Clin Genet Serv, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
clinical diagnostics; human phenotype ontology; next-generation sequencing; primary immunodeficiency; COMMON VARIABLE IMMUNODEFICIENCY; 3-KINASE DELTA SYNDROME; OF-FUNCTION MUTATIONS; IMMUNE DYSREGULATION; MYCOBACTERIAL INFECTION; MEDICAL GENETICS; WHOLE-EXOME; VARIANTS; DEFICIENCY; PHENOTYPE;
D O I
10.1111/cge.13163
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are rare monogenic inborn errors of immunity that result in impairment of functions of the human immune system. PIDs have a broad phenotype with increased morbidity and mortality, and treatment choices are often complex. With increased accessibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the rate of discovery of genetic causes for PID has increased exponentially. Identification of an underlying monogenic diagnosis provides important clinical benefits for patients with the potential to alter treatments, facilitate genetic counselling, and pre-implantation diagnostics. We investigated a NGS PID panel of 242 genes within clinical care across a range of PID phenotypes. We also evaluated Phenomizer to predict causal genes from human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms. Twenty-seven participants were recruited, and a total of 15 reportable variants were identified in 48% (13/27) of the participants. The panel results had implications for treatment in 37% (10/27) of participants. Phenomizer identified the genes harbouring variants from HPO terms in 33% (9/27) of participants. This study shows the clinical efficacy that genetic testing has in the care of PID. However, it also highlights some of the disadvantages of gene panels in the rapidly moving field of PID genomics and current challenges in HPO term assignment for PID.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing for Primary Immunodeficiency
    Padem, Nurcicek
    Ing, Alexander
    Yap, Kai Lee
    Mustafa, Asma
    Shank, Jessica
    McGinnis, Erin
    Weiss, Shelly
    Jennings, Larry
    Fuleihan, Ramsay L.
    Makhija, Melanie M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 143 (02) : AB110 - AB110
  • [2] Next-Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics
    Jacob, Howard J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (16): : 1557 - 1558
  • [3] Clinical evaluation of a hemochromatosis next-generation sequencing gene panel
    Lanktree, Matthew B.
    Sadikovic, Bekim
    Waye, John S.
    Levstik, Alexander
    Lanktree, Bruce B.
    Yudin, Jovana
    Crowther, Mark A.
    Pare, Guillaume
    Adams, Paul C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2017, 98 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [4] MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS OF MALIGNANT GLIOMAS USING NEXT-GENERATION GENE PANEL SEQUENCING
    Veiser, A.
    Kaulich, K.
    Stepanow, S.
    Wolter, M.
    Koehrer, K.
    Reifenberger, G.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16
  • [5] Clinical efficacy of next-generation sequencing panels for hearing loss diagnostics
    Suer, Funda
    Mazur, Zehra
    Zhang, Ying
    Cody, Neal
    Fox, Rebecca
    Shaw, Jay
    Shi, Lisong
    Shrivastava, Vibha
    Mendiratta, Geetu
    Newman, Scott
    Kasarskis, Andrew
    Zhang, Kejian
    Zimmerman, Rebekah
    Kornreich, Ruth
    Schadt, Eric E.
    Edelmann, Lisa
    Dincer, Aslihan
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (03) : S69 - S70
  • [6] Clinical Utility of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Diagnostics
    Alonso, Carmen M.
    Llop, Marta
    Sargas, Claudia
    Pedrola, Laia
    Panadero, Joaquin
    Hervas, David
    Cervera, Jose
    Such, Esperanza
    Ibanez, Mariam
    Ayala, Rosa
    Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin
    Onecha, Esther
    de Juan, Inmaculada
    Palanca, Sarai
    Martinez-Cuadron, David
    Rodriguez-Veiga, Rebeca
    Boluda, Blanca
    Montesinos, Pau
    Sanz, Guillermo
    Sanz, Miguel A.
    Barragan, Eva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 21 (02): : 228 - 240
  • [7] Next-generation DNA sequencing in clinical diagnostics
    Lacoste, C.
    Fabre, A.
    Pecheux, C.
    Levy, N.
    Krahn, M.
    Malzac, P.
    Bonello-Palot, N.
    Badens, C.
    Bourgeois, P.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2017, 24 (04): : 373 - 383
  • [8] Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostics and Clinical Research
    Hoefler, Gerald
    [J]. PATHOBIOLOGY, 2017, 84 (06) : 289 - 291
  • [9] Diagnostics of Primary Immunodeficiencies through Next-Generation Sequencing
    Gallo, Vera
    Dotta, Laura
    Giardino, Giuliana
    Cirillo, Emilia
    Lougaris, Vassilios
    D'Assante, Roberta
    Prandini, Alberto
    Consolini, Rita
    Farrow, Emily G.
    Thiffault, Isabelle
    Saunders, Carol J.
    Leonardi, Antonio
    Plebani, Alessandro
    Badolato, Raffaele
    Pignata, Claudio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [10] A TARGETED NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING GENE PANEL FOR AUTOINFLAMMATION
    Omoyinmi, E.
    Standing, A.
    Keylock, A.
    Rowczenio, D.
    Gomes, S. Melo
    Cullup, T.
    Jenkins, L.
    Gilmour, K.
    Eleftheriou, D.
    Lachmann, H.
    Hawkins, P.
    Klein, N.
    Brogan, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 667 - 667