Values-based shared decision-making in the antenatal period

被引:50
|
作者
Kukora, Stephanie K. [1 ,2 ]
Boss, Renee D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatal Perinatal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Antenatal counseling; Shared decision-making; Values; NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; LOW GESTATIONAL-AGE; HIGH-RISK NEWBORNS; CRITICALLY-ILL; COUNSELING SKILLS; PREMATURE-INFANTS; ETHICAL DILEMMAS; OF-LIFE; PARENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.siny.2017.09.003
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Despite advances in life-saving technology for critically ill neonates, challenges continue to arise for infants delivered with extreme prematurity, congenital anomalies, and genetic conditions that exceed the limits of currently available interventions. In these situations, parents are forced to make cognitively and emotionally difficult decisions, in discussion with a neonatologist, regarding how aggressively to provide supportive measures at the time of delivery and at what point burdens of therapy outweigh benefits. Current guidelines recommend that parents' values should guide these decisions; however, little is known about the values parents hold, and how those values are employed in the context of complexity, uncertainty, and emotionality of these situations. Systematic investigation of how parents derive their values and how clinicians should engage with parents about those values is necessary to guide the development of interventions to enhance shared decision-making processes, ultimately improving satisfaction, coping, and resilience and minimizing the potential for regret. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Values-Based Decision-Making for Conserving Built Heritage
    Bansal, Kanika
    Chhabra, Pankaj
    [J]. 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (DASA), 2022, : 1770 - 1774
  • [2] Ethical principles shaping values-based cybersecurity decision-making
    Fenech, Joseph
    Richards, Deborah
    Formosa, Paul
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2024, 140
  • [3] The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Care: A Values-Based Guide for Shared Decision Making
    Macri, Rosanna
    Roberts, Shannon L.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 2178 - 2186
  • [4] Clinician Perspectives on Incorporating Patients' Values-Based Health Priorities in Decision-Making
    Ouellet, Gregory M.
    Kiwak, Eliza
    Costello, Darce M.
    Green, Ariel R.
    Geda, Mary
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Tinetti, Mary E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (01) : 267 - 269
  • [5] Healthy persuasion: a values-based messaging approach to leisure air travel decision-making
    Higham, James
    Veisten, Knut
    Landa Mata, Iratxe
    Farstad, Eivind
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Bian, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2024,
  • [6] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    [J]. SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [8] Shared decision-making
    Dirksen-Fischer, M
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2004, 66 (05) : 318 - 318
  • [9] Shared decision-making
    Steven, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (462): : 61 - 62
  • [10] Shared Decision-Making
    Wright, Linda S.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 49 (06) : 537 - 540