Assessing Robustness of Inference in Symmetrical Nonlinear Regression Models

This article describes how diagnostic procedures were derived for symmetrical nonlinear regression models, continuing the work carried out by Cysneiros and Vanegas (2008) and Vanegas and Cysneiros (2010), who showed that the parameters estimates in nonlinear models are more robust with heavy-tailed than with normal errors. In this article, we focus on assessing if the robustness of this kind of models is also observed in the inference process (i.e., partial F-test). Symmetrical nonlinear regression models includes all symmetric continuous distributions for errors covering both light- and heavy-tailed distributions such as Student-t, logistic-I and -II, power exponential, generalized Student-t, generalized logistic, and contaminated normal. Firstly, a statistical test is shown to evaluating the assumption that the error terms all have equal variance. The results of simulation studies which describe the behavior of the test for heteroscedasticity proposed in the presence of outliers are then given. To assess the robustness of inference process, we present the results of a simulation study which described the behavior of partial F-test in the presence of outliers. Also, some diagnostic procedures are derived to identify influential observations on the partial F-test. As ilustration, a dataset described in Venables and Ripley (2002), is also analyzed.