Parasitofauna and current status of anthelmintic resistance in Latvian sheep farms

被引:2
|
作者
Keidane, Dace [1 ]
Klavina, Alina [1 ]
Bergmane, Marta Barbara [2 ]
Kovalcuka, Liga [2 ]
机构
[1] Latvia Univ Life Sci & Technol, Inst Food & Environm Hyg, Fac Vet Med, K Helmana St 8, LV-3004 Jelgava, Latvia
[2] Latvia Univ Life Sci & Technol, Inst Clin, Fac Vet Med, K Helmana St 8, LV-3004 Jelgava, Latvia
关键词
anthelmintic resistance; gastrointestinal parasites; sheep; GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES; HAEMONCHUS-CONTORTUS; IN-VIVO; DRUG; PREVALENCE; PARASITES; EGGCOUNTS; PACKAGE; GOATS;
D O I
10.14202/vetworld.2022.414-418
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Parasitic invasions, especially gastrointestinal nematodes, are widespread and are one of the main problems in sheep farms. For this reason, sheep are dewormed more often than other livestock species, often several times a year. Concerns about antiparasitic resistance from the farmers and veterinarians have arisen because, on some farms, antiparasitic drugs are used routinely for very long periods. There are no data available on anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep in Latvia. Our work aimed to determine the most common endoparasites in sheep and the degree of anthelmintic resistance on sheep farms in Latvia. Materials and Methods: All sheep (577) underwent a coprological examination before the start of the study, and only sheep diagnosed with more than 200 McMaster eggs per gram of feces were included in the study. A fecal egg count reduction (FECR) test was performed on 20 sheep flocks in Latvia. Results: In Latvia, sheep were most commonly infected with Eimeria spp. 97% (confidence interval [CI] 95% 96-98). The second most commonly diagnosed species were Trichostrongylidae 91% (CI 95% 89-93) and Strongyloides spp. 76% (CI 95%, 72-79). The ivermectin (IVM) FECR was 0.74% (0.73-0.74), showing resistance in all sheep farms included in this study. Albendazole (ABZ) FECR 0.89% (0.88-0.89) was effective. Conclusion: This study showed that the most popular deworming drugs (ivermectin, albendazole) in Latvia are ineffective in sheep. Additional studies on the use of IVM+ABZ combinations for deworming sheep should be performed.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 418
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anthelmintic resistance management in sheep
    Abbott, KA
    Taylor, MA
    Stubbings, LA
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2004, 154 (23) : 735 - 736
  • [32] The present status of anthelmintic resistance in sheep, goats and horses in the Slovak Republic
    Corba, J
    Várady, M
    Königová, A
    HELMINTHOLOGIA, 2002, 39 (04) : 217 - 220
  • [33] Multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep
    Sargison, N
    Scott, P
    Jackson, F
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2001, 149 (25) : 778 - 779
  • [34] ANTHELMINTIC RESISTANCE IN IMPORTED SHEEP
    HIMONAS, C
    PAPADOPOULOS, E
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (17) : 456 - 456
  • [36] Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends
    Nielsen, M. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY-DRUGS AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2022, 20 : 76 - 88
  • [37] Gastrointestinal nematode control practices on lowland sheep farms in Ireland with reference to selection for anthelmintic resistance
    Thomas Patten
    Barbara Good
    James P Hanrahan
    Grace Mulcahy
    Theo de Waal
    Irish Veterinary Journal, 64
  • [38] First report of anthelmintic resistance among sheep in six farms from three governorates in Jordan
    Mukbel, Rami M.
    Kreishan, Abdelqader A.
    Hammad, Haifa B.
    Al-Sabi, Mohammad N. S.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY- REGIONAL STUDIES AND REPORTS, 2025, 57
  • [39] Gastrointestinal nematode control practices on lowland sheep farms in Ireland with reference to selection for anthelmintic resistance
    Patten, Thomas
    Good, Barbara
    Hanrahan, James P.
    Mulcahy, Grace
    de Waal, Theo
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 64
  • [40] Nematode control practices on sheep farms following an information campaign aiming to delay anthelmintic resistance
    Morgan, E. R.
    Coles, G. C.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2010, 166 (10) : 301 - 303