Two Distinct Oral Routes of Misoprostol in Mifepristone Medical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:81
|
作者
Winikoff, Beverly
Dzuba, Ilana G. [1 ]
Creinin, Mitchell D.
Crowden, William A.
Goldberg, Alisa A.
Gonzales, Juliana
Howe, Michelle
Moskowitz, Jeffrey
Prine, Linda
Shannon, Caitlin S.
机构
[1] Gyun Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10010 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2008年 / 112卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818d8eb4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of oral immediately swallowed and buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg for terminating pregnancy through 63 days since the last menstrual period (LMP). METHODS: This seven-site study randomly assigned 966 women seeking abortions to oral or buccal misoprostol 800 mcg 24-36 hours after mifepristone 200 mg with 7-14-day follow-up. RESULTS: Success rates in the oral and buccal groups were 91.3%, (389 of 426) and 96.2% (405 of 421), respectively (P=.003; relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98). Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 3.5%, (15 of 426) of women who took oral misoprostol cornpared with 1.0% (4 of 421) of women in the buccal group (P=.012; RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-11.07). Through 49 days since the LMP, oral and buccal regimens performed similarly, but success with oral misoprostol decreased as pregnancy advanced. In pregnancies of 57-63 (lays since the LMP, success with oral misoprostol fell below 90%, whereas that with buccal remained high (oral 85.1%, [97 of 114], buccal 94.8% [109 of 115], P=.015, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98). Furthermore, in this gestational age group, there were significantly more ongoing pregnancies among women who took misoprostol orally (7.9% [9 of 114]) compared with buccally (1.7% [2 of 115]; P=.029, RR 4.54, 95% CI 1.0-20.55). Adverse effect profiles were similar, although fever and chills were reported approximately 10% more often among women who took buccal misoprostol. Satisfaction and acceptability were high for both methods. CONCLUSION: Buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg is a good option for medical abortion through 63 days since the LMP. Oral misoprostol 800 mcg is also a safe and effective alternative, although success rates diminish with increasing gestational age.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1310
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OVULATION RESUMPTION AFTER MEDICAL ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL
    Sober, S.
    Ratcliffe, S.
    Creinin, M. D.
    Schreiber, C.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (02) : 207 - 207
  • [42] Factors related to completeness of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Jiang, Wen-Xiao
    He, Fang-Fang
    Shen, Qi
    Tao, Xue-Jiao
    Zhao, Chu-Chu
    Shen, Zhao-Jun
    Zhu, Xue-Qiong
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 80 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [43] Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Haimov-Kochman, Ronit
    Arbel, Revital
    Sciaky-Tamir, Yael
    Brzezinski, Amnon
    Laufer, Neri
    Yagel, Simcha
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (04) : 462 - 466
  • [44] Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion A Systematic Review
    Chen, Melissa J.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01): : 12 - 21
  • [45] Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Sober, Stephanie
    Ratcliffe, Sarah
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (03) : 230 - 233
  • [46] Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone plus misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone
    Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoca
    Blum, Jennifer
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Nguyen Thi Bach Nge
    Dabash, Rasha
    Diop, Ayisha
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (05) : 410 - 417
  • [47] The potential of two non-vaginal routes of misoprostol administration following mifepristone for medical abortion up to 63 days gestation
    Dzuba, I
    Britton, T.
    Creinin, M. D.
    Goldberg, A.
    Hanson, R.
    Lichtenberg, E. S.
    Molaei, M.
    Prine, L.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (02) : 161 - 162
  • [48] METHOTREXATE AND MISOPROSTOL VS MISOPROSTOL ALONE FOR EARLY ABORTION - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    CREININ, MD
    VITTINGHOFF, E
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (15): : 1190 - 1195
  • [49] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial
    Dadhwal, Vatsla
    Garimella, Sita
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sharma, K. Aparna
    Perumal, Vanamail
    Deka, Dipika
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (03): : 262 - 266
  • [50] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion:: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Grimes, DA
    Smith, MS
    Witham, AD
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (02) : 148 - 153