Reaction profile in patch testing with allergens formed during vulcanization of rubber

被引:49
|
作者
Hansson, Christer [1 ]
Ponten, Ann [2 ]
Svedman, Cecilia [2 ]
Bergendorff, Ola [1 ]
机构
[1] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
mercaptobenzothiazole; accelerator; contact dermatitis; dithiocarbamate; allergy; thiuram; rubber; vulcanization; monosulfide; CONTACT-DERMATITIS; STANDARD SERIES; GLOVES; LATEX; MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; ACCELERATORS; DISULFIRAM; ADDITIVES;
D O I
10.1111/cod.12168
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Vulcanization of rubber changes its allergen pattern. Objectives To estimate the contact allergic reactivity profile of users of finished rubber products. Methods Twenty-four patients with known contact allergy to rubber accelerators were patch tested with 21 compounds found in chemical analyses of vulcanized rubber products. No diphenylguanidine, p-phenylenediamine antioxidants or thioureas were included in the study. Results Thiuram monosulfides formed during vulcanization showed generally stronger test reactions than the corresponding thiuram disulfides. We also obtained more positive thiuram reactions to the monosulfides than to the disulfides. A positive reaction to a dithiocarbamate was accompanied by a positive reaction to the corresponding thiuram, except for 1 patient. The nitrogen substituents showed only minor differences between the methyl, ethyl and pentamethylene groups, but the butyl derivatives gave, in most cases, a negative response. Dialkylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulfides, formed between thiurams and mercaptobenzothiazoles during vulcanization, showed strong test reactions in almost all patients who were sensitive to dithiocarbamates, thiurams, or mercaptobenzothiazoles. Conclusions We found thiuram monosulfides to be better markers of thiuram sensitivity than the corresponding disulfides or dithiocarbamates. Surprisingly, the dialkylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulfides were good markers of both thiuram and mercaptobenzothiazole sensitivity. This is an unexpected finding that needs to be confirmed in a larger study.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Thermo-mechanical behaviour of rubber materials during vulcanization
    André, M
    Wriggers, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2005, 42 (16-17) : 4758 - 4778
  • [42] The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex
    Brasch, Jochen
    Schnuch, Axel
    Uter, Wolfgang
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2008, 58 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [43] Computer simulation of changing the rubber network structure during vulcanization
    Jurkowska, B
    Jurkowski, B
    KAUTSCHUK GUMMI KUNSTSTOFFE, 1998, 51 (7-8): : 534 - 539
  • [44] STUDY ON FORMATION OF RUBBER-METAL BOND DURING VULCANIZATION
    KLEMENT, G
    KAUTSCHUK GUMMI KUNSTSTOFFE, 1971, 24 (07): : 340 - &
  • [45] Contact eczema - Rubber cements as adhesive in patch testing
    Shelmire, B
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY AND SYPHILOLOGY, 1933, 28 (06): : 795 - 797
  • [47] Limited availability of diagnostic allergens for patch testing compromises patient care
    Mahler, Vera
    Schnuch, Axel
    Bauer, Andrea
    Werfel, Thomas
    Stroemer, Klaus
    Enk, Alexander
    Bieber, Thomas
    Klimek, Ludger
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2016, 14 (07): : 743 - 745
  • [48] Patch Testing Detection of Contact Allergens in Medical Treatments for Allergic Conjunctivitis
    Om, Anjali
    Yeung, Howa
    de la Feld, Salma
    DERMATITIS, 2021, 32 (05) : E75 - E76
  • [49] Supplemental Patch Testing Identifies Allergens Missed by Standard Screening Series
    Atwater, Amber Reck
    Liu, Beiyu
    Walsh, Rabina
    Bembry, Raina
    Ward, Jordan Maxwell
    Green, Cynthia L.
    DERMATITIS, 2024, 35 (04) : 366 - 372
  • [50] Patch testing in children commonly identifies relevant allergens: a retrospective review
    Moustafa, M.
    Athavale, P.
    Cork, M.
    Messenger, A. G.
    Gawkrodger, D. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 159 : 88 - 88