Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers

被引:10
|
作者
Liu, Dingxie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bluewater Biotech LLC, POB 1010, New Providence, NJ 07974 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Gene signature; Long non-coding RNA; Estrogen receptor; Triple-negative breast cancer; Cancer recurrence; EXPRESSION-BASED PREDICTORS; RECURRENCE; RISK; CONCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-020-05770-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The development of multi-gene signatures has led to improvements in identification of breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence. The prognostic power of commercially available gene signatures is mostly restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. On the contrary, immune-related gene signatures predict prognosis only in ER-negative breast cancer. This study aimed to develop a better prognostic signature for breast cancer. Methods The expressions of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes from 30 independent microarray datasets with a total of 4813 samples were analyzed. A prognostic lncRNA signature was developed based on likelihood-ratio Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis was used to compare the prognostic efficiencies of our signature and 10 previously reported prognostic gene signatures. Results Cox regression analysis on 30 independent datasets showed that the 6-lncRNA signature identified in this study performed as well as five commercially available signatures in recurrence prediction for ER-positive breast cancer. In ER-negative breast cancer, this lncRNA signature was as prognostic as three immune-related gene signatures. Moreover, our lncRNA signature also demonstrated a good capacity to predict recurrence risk for triple-negative breast cancer. Function analysis showed that several lncRNAs in this signature were probably involved in cell proliferation and immune processes. Conclusions A six-LncRNA signature was identified that is prognostic for ER-positive, ER-negative, and triple-negative breast cancers and thus deserves further validation in prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Oxysterol signalling is retained in ER-negative and supressed in ER-positive breast cancer
    Hutchinson, Samantha
    Battaglia, Sebastiano
    Roberg-Larsen, Hanne
    Lianto, Priscilia
    Hughes, Thomas
    Thorne, James
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2020, 79 (OCE2) : E142 - E142
  • [12] Clinical significance of ERβ mRNA expression in ERα-negative and triple-negative breast cancers
    Kim, Young Choi
    Kim, Hadong
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [13] Estrogen receptor variants in ER-positive basal-type breast cancers responding to therapy like ER-negative breast cancers
    Floris H. Groenendijk
    Tina Treece
    Erin Yoder
    Paul Baron
    Peter Beitsch
    William Audeh
    Winand N. M. Dinjens
    Rene Bernards
    Pat Whitworth
    [J]. npj Breast Cancer, 5
  • [14] Estrogen receptor variants in ER-positive basal-type breast cancers responding to therapy like ER-negative breast cancers
    Groenendijk, Floris H.
    Treece, Tina
    Yoder, Erin
    Baron, Paul
    Beitsch, Peter
    Audeh, William
    Dinjens, Winand N. M.
    Bernards, Rene
    Whitworth, Pat
    [J]. NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2019, 5 (1)
  • [15] Interleukin-8 in progression of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer patients
    Todorovic-Rakovic, N.
    Milovanovic, J.
    Abu Rabi, Z.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S115 - S115
  • [16] Genomic predictors of pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy for triple-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers
    Hatzis, C.
    Symmans, W. F.
    Lin, F.
    Zheng, B.
    Yan, K.
    Booser, D. J.
    Gong, Y.
    Valero, V.
    Hortobagyi, G. N.
    Pusztai, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [17] Functional characterization of lncRNA152 in ER+ and triple-negative breast cancers
    Kim, Daeseok
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [18] Genetic Copy Number Differences Between ER-positive and ER-negative Human Breast Carcinoma
    Fang, M.
    Toher, J.
    Morgan, M.
    Davison, J.
    Tannenbaum, S.
    Claffey, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2009, 11 (06): : 666 - 666
  • [19] Claudin Expression in Triple Negative and ER-Positive Breast Carcinoma
    Malik, M. A.
    Cohen, C.
    Adams, A.
    Wang, J.
    Oprea, G. M.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 56A - 56A
  • [20] Claudin Expression in Triple Negative and ER-Positive Breast Carcinoma
    Malik, M. A.
    Cohen, C.
    Adams, A.
    Wang, J.
    Oprea, G. M.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 56A - 56A