An agenda for clinical decision making and judgement in nursing research and education

被引:95
|
作者
Thompson, Carl [1 ]
Aitken, Leanne [2 ,3 ]
Doran, Diane [4 ]
Dowding, Dawn [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Griffith Univ, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[4] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Healthcare, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Clinical judgement; Clinical decision making; Decision support; Nurse decision; Patient safety; FAILURE SPECIALIST NURSES; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; RESEARCH INFORMATION; ADVERSE EVENTS; TIME PRESSURE; CARE; INFERENCE; UNCERTAINTY; HEURISTICS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Nurses' judgements and decisions have the potential to help healthcare systems allocate resources efficiently, promote health gain and patient benefit and prevent harm. Evidence from healthcare systems throughout the world suggests that judgements and decisions made by clinicians could be improved: around half of all adverse events have some kind of error at their core. For nursing to contribute to raising quality though improved judgements and decisions within health systems we need to know more about the decisions and judgements themselves, the interventions likely to improve judgement and decision processes and outcomes, and where best to target finite intellectual and educational resources. There is a rich heritage of research into decision making and judgement, both from within the discipline of nursing and from other perspectives, but which focus on nurses. Much of this evidence plays only a minor role in the development of educational and technological efforts at decision improvement. This paper presents nine unanswered questions that researchers and educators might like to consider as a potential agenda for the future of research into this important area of nursing practice, training and development. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1720 / 1726
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Judgement: clinical decision-making as a core surgical competency
    Crebbin, Wendy
    Beasley, Spencer
    Tobin, Stephen
    Guest, Glenn
    Duvivier, Robbert
    Watters, David
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (06) : 760 - 763
  • [22] Investigating the impact of cognitive bias in nursing documentation on decision-making and judgement
    Martin, Krystle
    Bickle, Korri
    Lok, Jessica
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2022, 31 (04) : 897 - 907
  • [23] Judgement and decision making issues
    Koele, P
    Teigen, KH
    van der Pligt, J
    Wu, G
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (03) : 281 - 282
  • [24] PLANNING, ORGANIZATIONS AND DECISION-MAKING - A RESEARCH AGENDA
    WACHS, M
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1985, 19 (5-6) : 521 - 531
  • [25] Ethical decision making in international nursing research
    Mill, JE
    Ogilvie, LD
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (06) : 807 - 815
  • [26] The preliminary research of judgement and decision-making in the cockpit based on CREAM
    Sun Rui-shan
    Wang Xin
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (MSE 2010), VOL 4, 2010, : 243 - 247
  • [27] Computerized decision support: a valuable means to support nurses' clinical judgement and decision making?
    Thoma-Lurken, Theresa
    Bleijlevens, Michel H. C.
    Hamers, Jan P. H.
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2019, 18
  • [28] Cognitive abilities and clinical decision making in nursing
    de Jesus, Elvio Henriques
    [J]. Consumer-Centered Computer-Suppported Care for Healthy People, 2006, 122 : 783 - 783
  • [29] A Philosophical Analysis of Clinical Decision Making in Nursing
    Krishnan, Preetha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2018, 57 (02) : 73 - 78
  • [30] IMPROVING CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN NURSING
    JENKINS, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 1985, 24 (06) : 242 - 243