A case-by-case approach to pleading scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

被引：4

|

作者：

Roskoski, M

机构：

来源：

MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW | 1999年 / 97卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1290186

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

收藏

页码：2265 / 2294

页数：30

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Pleading scienter after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Or, a textualist revenge
Dunn, MB
[J]. CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1998, 84 (01) : 193 - 251
[2] Would the real scienter please stand up: The effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 on pleading securities fraud
Miest, RG
[J]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 82 (04) : 1103 - 1137
[3] A new pleading standard under the private securities litigation reform act?
Phillips, JT
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2001, 69 (03) : 969 - 992
[4] Pleading securities fraud using confidential sources under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: It's all in the details
McKenna, KB
[J]. RUTGERS LAW REVIEW, 2002, 55 (01) : 205 - 237
[5] The nonretroactivity of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Gonick, SS
Daley, JD
[J]. SECURITIES REGULATION LAW JOURNAL, 1997, 25 (01): : 60 - 86
[6] Securities litigation reform: The long and winding road to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Avery, JW
[J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 1996, 51 (02): : 335 - &
[7] Closing the loophole in the private securities litigation reform act of 1995
Kou, JC
[J]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1998, 73 (01) : 253 - 292
[8] The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: A preliminary analysis
Black, SF
Weissman, AB
Kroll, AN
[J]. SECURITIES REGULATION LAW JOURNAL, 1996, 24 (02): : 117 - 142
[9] A new standard for aiders and abettors under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Lowenfels, LD
Bromberg, AR
[J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 1996, 52 (01): : 1 - &
[10] Pleading around the private securities litigation reform act: Reevaluating the pleading requirements for market manipulation claims
Moos, D
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2005, 78 (03) : 763 - 794

← 1 2 3 4 5 →