Asset Returns Under Model Uncertainty: Evidence from the Euro Area, the US and the UK

被引:3
|
作者
Sousa, Joao M. [1 ]
Sousa, Ricardo M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] European Cent Bank, Sonnemannstr 22, D-60314 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Minho, Dept Econ, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, Econ Policies Res Unit NIPE, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[4] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Alumni Assoc, Houghton St, London WC2 2AE, England
关键词
Stock returns; Model uncertainty; Bayesian Model Averaging; E21; G11; E44; STOCK RETURNS; EXPECTED RETURNS; CROSS-SECTION; LONG-RUN; CONSUMPTION; RISK; PREDICTABILITY; SELECTION; EXPECTATIONS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-017-9696-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze predictability of risk premium in the context of model uncertainty. Using data for the euro area, the US and the UK, we show that there is a large amount of model uncertainty and one can improve the forecasts of stock returns with a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach. The empirical evidence for the euro area suggests that several macroeconomic, financial and macro-financial variables are consistently among the most prominent determinants of risk premium. As for the US, only a few number of predictors play an important role. In the case of the UK, future stock returns are better forecasted by financial variables. These results are corroborated for both the M-open and the M-closed perspectives, different model priors and in the context of in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting. Finally, we highlight that the predictive ability of the BMA framework is stronger at longer periods, and clearly outperforms the constant expected returns and the autoregressive benchmark models.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 176
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asymmetric information, illiquidity and asset returns: evidence from China
    Li, Guangchuan
    Lu, Lei
    Wu, Bo
    Zhang, Zhou
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2014, 14 (06) : 947 - 957
  • [42] The Procyclicality of Banking: Evidence from the Euro Area
    Harry Huizinga
    Luc Laeven
    [J]. IMF Economic Review, 2019, 67 : 496 - 527
  • [43] CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL UNDER DISTRIBUTION UNCERTAINTY
    Chen, Yu
    Cui, Zixian
    Di, Shihan
    Zhao, Peibiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 18 (05) : 3283 - 3313
  • [44] Does non-linearity help us understand, model and forecast UK stock and bond returns: evidence from the BEYR
    McMillan, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 26 (01) : 125 - 143
  • [45] Complexity in financial asset returns: Evidence from the compass rose
    Batten, Jonathan A.
    Lucey, Brian M.
    Peat, Maurice
    [J]. CHAOS, 2018, 28 (12)
  • [46] Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data
    Ioannatos, Petros E.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 63 (01) : 117 - 138
  • [47] Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data
    Petros E. Ioannatos
    [J]. Comparative Economic Studies, 2021, 63 : 117 - 138
  • [48] Spillover effects of debt and growth in the euro area: Evidence from a GVAR model
    Kempa, Bernd
    Khan, Nazmus Sadat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2017, 49 : 102 - 111
  • [49] Investor sentiment and the predictability of asset returns: Evidence from China
    Hu, Changsheng
    Sun, Wei
    Wang, Yongfeng
    Chi, Yangchun
    [J]. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6 (06) : 577 - 585
  • [50] Oil price shock in the US and the euro area - evidence from the shadow rate and the term premium
    Pazicky, Martin
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 21 (03) : 309 - 346