Effects of Ethanol on Vehicle Energy Efficiency and Implications on Ethanol Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis

被引:41
|
作者
Yan, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Inderwildi, Oliver R. [3 ]
King, David A. [3 ]
Boies, Adam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9EZ, Cornwall, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Smith Sch Enterprise & Environm, Oxford OX1 2BQ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
EXHAUST EMISSIONS; BLENDED GASOLINE; FUEL; ENGINE; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTANTS; COMBUSTION; PREDICTION; BENEFITS; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1021/es305209a
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioethanol is the world's largest-produced alternative to petroleum-derived transportation fuels due to its compatibility within existing spark-ignition engines and its relatively mature production technology. Despite its success, questions remain over the greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of fuel ethanol use with many studies showing significant impacts of differences in land use, feedstock, and refinery operation. While most efforts to quantify life-cycle GHG impacts have focused on the production stage, a few recent studies have acknowledged the effect of ethanol on engine performance and incorporated these effects into the fuel life cycle. These studies have broadly asserted that vehicle efficiency increases with ethanol use to justify reducing the GHG impact of ethanol.;These results seem to conflict with the general notion that ethanol decreases the fuel efficiency (or increases the fuel consumption) of vehicles due to the lower volumetric energy content of ethanol when compared to gasoline. Here we argue that due to the increased emphasis on alternative fuels with drastically differing energy densities, vehicle efficiency should be evaluated based on energy rather than volume. When done so, we show that efficiency of existing vehicles can be affected by ethanol content, but these impacts can serve to have both positive and negative effects and are highly uncertain (ranging from -15% to +24%). As a result, uncertainties in the net GHG effect of ethanol, particularly when used in a low-level blend with gasoline, are considerably larger than previously estimated (standard deviations increase by >10% and >200% when used in high and low blends, respectively). Technical options exist to improve vehicle efficiency through smarter use of ethanol though changes to the vehicle fleets and fuel infrastructure would be required. Future biofuel policies should promote synergies between the vehicle and fuel industries in order to maximize the society-wise benefits or minimize the risks of adverse impacts of ethanol.
引用
收藏
页码:5535 / 5544
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
    Norman, J
    MacLean, HL
    Kennedy, CA
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 132 (01) : 10 - 21
  • [32] Development and application of an electric vehicles life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions analysis model
    Peng, Tianduo
    Ou, Xunmin
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2018, 131 : 699 - 708
  • [33] Life-Cycle Analysis of Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Anaerobic Biodegradation of Municipal Solid Waste
    DiStefano, Thomas D.
    Belenky, Lucas G.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (11) : 1097 - 1105
  • [34] Analysis of net energy production in the corn ethanol life cycle
    Ding W.-W.
    Yuan L.
    Tang X.-Y.
    Xiao Z.-Y.
    Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2010, 31 (06): : 773 - 779
  • [35] Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Kelly, Jarod C.
    Sullivan, John L.
    Burnham, Andrew
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (20) : 12535 - 12542
  • [36] Incremental approach for the life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of carbon capture and utilization
    Yoo, Eunji
    Lee, Uisung
    Zang, Guiyan
    Sun, Pingping
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Wang, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2022, 65
  • [37] Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Water Treatment Systems
    Racoviceanu, Alina I.
    Karney, Bryan W.
    Kennedy, Christopher A.
    Colombo, Andrew F.
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (04) : 261 - 270
  • [38] Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China
    Ou, Xunmin
    Yan Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Xiliang
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (01) : 289 - 297
  • [39] Life-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Benefits of Lightweighting in Automobiles: Review and Harmonization
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (12) : 6089 - 6097
  • [40] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Benefits of Natural Gas Vehicles
    He, Xiaoyi
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    Anderson, James E.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Shen, Wei
    De Kleine, Robert
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    Winkler, Sandy
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (23) : 7813 - 7823