Effects of Ethanol on Vehicle Energy Efficiency and Implications on Ethanol Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis

被引:41
|
作者
Yan, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Inderwildi, Oliver R. [3 ]
King, David A. [3 ]
Boies, Adam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9EZ, Cornwall, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Smith Sch Enterprise & Environm, Oxford OX1 2BQ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
EXHAUST EMISSIONS; BLENDED GASOLINE; FUEL; ENGINE; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTANTS; COMBUSTION; PREDICTION; BENEFITS; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1021/es305209a
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioethanol is the world's largest-produced alternative to petroleum-derived transportation fuels due to its compatibility within existing spark-ignition engines and its relatively mature production technology. Despite its success, questions remain over the greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of fuel ethanol use with many studies showing significant impacts of differences in land use, feedstock, and refinery operation. While most efforts to quantify life-cycle GHG impacts have focused on the production stage, a few recent studies have acknowledged the effect of ethanol on engine performance and incorporated these effects into the fuel life cycle. These studies have broadly asserted that vehicle efficiency increases with ethanol use to justify reducing the GHG impact of ethanol.;These results seem to conflict with the general notion that ethanol decreases the fuel efficiency (or increases the fuel consumption) of vehicles due to the lower volumetric energy content of ethanol when compared to gasoline. Here we argue that due to the increased emphasis on alternative fuels with drastically differing energy densities, vehicle efficiency should be evaluated based on energy rather than volume. When done so, we show that efficiency of existing vehicles can be affected by ethanol content, but these impacts can serve to have both positive and negative effects and are highly uncertain (ranging from -15% to +24%). As a result, uncertainties in the net GHG effect of ethanol, particularly when used in a low-level blend with gasoline, are considerably larger than previously estimated (standard deviations increase by >10% and >200% when used in high and low blends, respectively). Technical options exist to improve vehicle efficiency through smarter use of ethanol though changes to the vehicle fleets and fuel infrastructure would be required. Future biofuel policies should promote synergies between the vehicle and fuel industries in order to maximize the society-wise benefits or minimize the risks of adverse impacts of ethanol.
引用
收藏
页码:5535 / 5544
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on "Effects of Ethanol on Vehicle Energy Efficiency and Implications on Ethanol Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis"
    Strogen, Bret
    Souza, Simone Pereira
    Lidicker, Jeffrey R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (16) : 9950 - 9952
  • [2] Response to Comment on "Effects of Ethanol on Vehicle Energy Efficiency and Implications on Ethanol Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis"
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Inderwildi, Oliver R.
    King, David A.
    Boies, Adam M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (16) : 9953 - 9954
  • [3] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    Fuentes, Alfredo
    Hennecke, Anna
    Riegelhaupt, Enrique
    Manzini, Fabio
    Masera, Omar
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (06) : 2088 - 2097
  • [4] Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emission implications of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol simulated with the GREET model
    Wang, Michael
    Wu, May
    Huo, Hong
    Liu, Jiahong
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2008, 110 (1317): : 527 - +
  • [5] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn kernel fiber ethanol
    Qin, Zhangcai
    Li, Qianfeng
    Wang, Michael
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 (06): : 1013 - 1022
  • [6] Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn-Ethanol
    Liska, Adam J.
    Yang, Haishun S.
    Bremer, Virgil R.
    Klopfenstein, Terry J.
    Walters, Daniel T.
    Erickson, Galen E.
    Cassman, Kenneth G.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 13 (01) : 58 - 74
  • [7] Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types
    Wang, Michael
    Hong, May Wu
    Huo, Hong
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 2 (02):
  • [8] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential for corn ethanol refining in the USA
    Xu, Hui
    Lee, Uisung
    Wang, Michael
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2022, 16 (03): : 671 - 681
  • [9] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emission and energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell scooters
    Hwang, Jenn Jiang
    Chang, Wei Ru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (21) : 11947 - 11956
  • [10] Life-cycle energy and economic analysis of sweet sorghum ethanol in China
    Gao, Hui
    Hu, Shanying
    Li, Yourun
    Chen, Dingjiang
    Zhu, Bing
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2010, 50 (11): : 1858 - 1863