Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children With Moderate-size Kidney Stones: Results of Multi-institutional Analysis

被引:78
|
作者
Resorlu, Berkan
Unsal, Ali
Tepeler, Abdulkadir
Atis, Gokhan
Tokatli, Zafer
Oztuna, Derya
Armagan, Abdullah
Gurbuz, Cenk
Caskurlu, Turhan
Saglam, Remzi
机构
[1] Kecioren Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Goztepe Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Cankaya Doruk Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[6] Medicana Int Ankara Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; STAGHORN CALCULI; RENAL STONES; MANAGEMENT; URETEROSCOPY; COMPLICATIONS; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in children for 10- to 30-mm renal calculi by evaluating operative data, stone-free rates, and associated complications. METHODS The records of 201 pediatric patients who underwent mini-perc (n = 106) or RIRS (n = 95) for intrarenal stones of 10- to 30-mm size were reviewed retrospectively. The chi(2) test was applied to compare the success rates, postoperative complications, and blood transfusion rates, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the means of hospital stay, fluoroscopy, and operative time for mini-perc and RIRS. RESULTS The stone-free rate was 84.2% for the RIRS group and 85.8% for the mini-perc group after a single procedure (P = .745). These percentages increased to 92.6% and 94.3% with adjunctive therapies for RIRS and mini-perc, respectively. Minor complications classified as Clavien I or II occurred in 17% and 8.4% in mini-perc and RIRS, respectively. No major complications (Clavien III-V) occurred in either group. Overall complication rates in mini-perc were higher, but the differences were not statistically significant (P = .07). However, 7 patients in the mini-perc group received blood transfusions, whereas none of the children in the RIRS group were transfused (P = .015). The mean hospital stay, fluoroscopy, and operation times were significantly longer in the mini-perc group. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that RIRS is an effective alternative to mini-perc in pediatric patients with intermediate-sized renal stones. Operative time, radiation exposure, hospital stay, and morbidities of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) can be significantly reduced with the RIRS technique. UROLOGY 80: 519-523, 2012. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 523
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2-3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Sun, Hongling
    Zeng, Tao
    Deng, Tuo
    Liu, Yongda
    Zeng, Guohua
    UROLITHIASIS, 2020, 48 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [22] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderately Sized Pediatric Kidney Stones
    Bas, Okan
    Dede, Onur
    Aydogmus, Yasin
    Utangac, Mazhar
    Yikilmaz, Taha Numan
    Damar, Erman
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (07) : 765 - 770
  • [23] Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Jeong Woo
    Park, Juhyun
    Lee, Seung Bae
    Son, Hwancheol
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Jeong, Hyeon
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (05) : 873 - 877
  • [24] Bibliometric analysis of the management of kidney stones, a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery
    Chen, Sy-Yuan
    Pang, See-Tong
    Hsieh, Ming-Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 114 - 115
  • [25] Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model
    Steeve Doizi
    Audrey Uzan
    Etienne Xavier Keller
    Vincent De Coninck
    Hatem Kamkoum
    Yazeed Barghouthy
    Eugenio Ventimiglia
    Olivier Traxer
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 2709 - 2717
  • [26] Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model
    Doizi, Steeve
    Uzan, Audrey
    Keller, Etienne Xavier
    De Coninck, Vincent
    Kamkoum, Hatem
    Barghouthy, Yazeed
    Ventimiglia, Eugenio
    Traxer, Olivier
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (07) : 2709 - 2717
  • [27] Comparison of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for the Minimal Invasive Management of Lower Caliceal Stones
    Coskun, Alper
    Eryildirim, Bilal
    Sarica, Kemal
    Camur, Emre
    Can, Utku
    Saglam, Erkin
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (05) : 485 - 490
  • [28] In situ Management of Large Upper Ureteric Calculus by Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Era of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
    Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash
    Thangarasu, Mathisekaran
    Jain, Nitesh
    Bafna, Sandeep
    Paul, Rajesh
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2020, 12 : 633 - 638
  • [29] Re: An Easy Risk Stratification to Recommend the Optimal Patients with 2-3 cm Kidney Stones to Receive Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01): : 26 - 27
  • [30] Ultra-mini flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size kidney stones: a new instrument, a preliminary prospective study
    Fatih Kursat Yilmazel
    Ahmet Emre Cinislioglu
    Ibrahim Karabulut
    Ali Haydar Yilmaz
    Fatih Ozkaya
    Senol Adanur
    Urolithiasis, 2021, 49 : 345 - 350