Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infections in Antenatal Hydronephrosis

被引:78
|
作者
Braga, Luis H. [1 ]
Mijovic, Hana [1 ]
Farrokhyar, Forough [1 ]
Pemberton, Julia [1 ]
DeMaria, Jorge [1 ]
Lorenzo, Armando J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Div Urol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
关键词
antibiotic; hydronephrosis; prophylaxis or prevention; urinary tract infection; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; INFANTS; MANAGEMENT; DILATATION; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; RISK;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2012-1870
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) is recommended to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in newborns with antenatal hydronephrosis (HN). However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence supporting this practice. The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic evaluation to determine the value of CAP in reducing the rate of UTIs in this patient population. METHODS: Pertinent articles and abstracts from 4 electronic databases and gray literature, spanning publication dates between 1990 and 2010, were included. Eligibility criteria included studies of children <2 years old with antenatal HN, receiving either CAP or not, and reporting on development of UTIs, capturing information on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) result and HN grade. Full-text screening and quality appraisal were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of 1681 citations, 21 were included in the final analysis (N = 3876 infants). Of these, 76% were of moderate or low quality. Pooled UTI rates in patients with low-grade HN were similar regardless of CAP status: 2.2% on prophylaxis versus 2.8% not receiving prophylaxis. In children with high-grade HN, patients receiving CAP had a significantly lower UTI rate versus those not receiving CAP (14.6% [95% confidence interval: 9.3-22.0] vs 28.9% [95% confidence interval: 24.6-33.6], P < .01). The estimated number needed to treat to prevent 1 UTI in patients with high-grade HN was 7. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests value in offering CAP to infants with high-grade HN, however the impact of important variables (eg, gender, reflux, circumcision status) could not be assessed. The overall level of evidence of available data is unfortunately moderate to low. Pediatrics 2013; 131:e251-e261
引用
收藏
页码:E251 / E261
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibiotic Prophylaxis Against Urinary Tract Infections After Renal Transplant
    Klem, P.
    Gralla, J.
    Chang, D.
    Wiseman, A.
    Davis, S.
    Cooper, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 472 - 472
  • [22] Recurrent urinary tract infections. Antibiotic resistance and non-antibiotic prophylaxis
    Beerepoot, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 42 : S38 - S38
  • [23] Review: Antibiotic prophylaxis on removal of urinary catheters reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections
    Maki, Dennis G.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 159 (08)
  • [24] Risk factors of urinary tract infection in children with antenatal hydronephrosis
    Coelho, G.
    Bouzada, M.
    Pereira, A.
    Lima, B.
    Leite, M.
    Figueiredo, B.
    Oliveira, D.
    Amaro, A.
    Chaves, A.
    Oliveira, E.
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 22 (09) : 1464 - 1464
  • [25] Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infection
    Finley, Caitlin R.
    Falk, Jamie
    Korownyk, Christina S.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2022, 68 (12) : 896 - 896
  • [26] Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent recurrent infection in children with urinary tract infections
    Wald, Ellen
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 156 (05): : 856 - 857
  • [27] Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida on Intermittent Catheterization
    Zegers, Bas
    Uiterwaal, Cuno
    Kimpen, Jan
    van Gool, Jan
    de Jong, Tom
    Winkler-Seinstra, Pauline
    Houterman, Saskia
    Verpoorten, Carla
    van Steenwijk, Catharine de Jong-de Vos
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06): : 2365 - 2370
  • [28] Is antibiotic prophylaxis effective in preventing urinary tract infections in patients with vesicoureteral reflux?
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Kamisawa, Hideyuki
    Imura, Makoto
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2010, 8 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [29] INCIDENCE OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN NEWBORNS WITH SPINA BIFIDA: IS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS NECESSARY?
    Wallis, M. Chad
    Paramsothy, Pangaja
    Thibadeau, Judy
    Routh, Jonathan
    Joseph, David
    Cheng, Earl
    Tu, Duong
    Austin, Chris
    Koh, Chester
    Austin, Paul
    Tanaka, Stacy
    Walker, William
    Smith, Kathy
    Baum, Michelle
    Wiener, John
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E927 - E928
  • [30] Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Urinary Catheter Removal Prevents Urinary Tract Infections A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Pfefferkorn, Urs
    Lea, Sanlav
    Moldenhauer, Joerg
    Peterli, Ralph
    von Fluee, Markus
    Ackermann, Christoph
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (04) : 573 - 575