Endometrial progesterone receptors and markers of uterine receptivity in the window of implantation

被引:167
|
作者
Lessey, BA
Yeh, IT
Castelbaum, AJ
Fritz, MA
Ilesanmi, AO
Korzeniowski, P
Sun, JH
Chwalisz, K
机构
[1] NO FERTIL & REPROD ASSOCIATES,MEADOWBROOK,PA
[2] ABINGTON MEM HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,ABINGTON,PA
[3] SCHERING AG,RES LABS,W-1000 BERLIN,GERMANY
关键词
endometrial receptivity; progesterone receptors; implantation;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58140-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the expression of endometrial P receptors (PR) levels with markers of endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation. Design: Prospective, controlled study to examine endometrial PR and three cycle-specific integrins in endometrial biopsies obtained during the window of implantation. Setting: An academic teaching hospital. Patients: One hundred seventy-five endometrial biopsies from regularly cycling women with luteal phase defect (LPD; group 1; n = 80), medically treated LPD (group 2; n = 16), minimal and mild endometriosis with aberrant alpha v beta 3 expression (group 3; n = 21), fertile controls (group 4; n = 26), and infertile controls (group 5; n = 32). Main Outcome Measure: Immunohistochemical staining intensity of each antigen using the semi-quantitative grading system (HSCORE), compared using analysis of variance with Scheffe's correction. Results: Among the five groups studied, nuclear PR expression was significantly elevated in glandular epithelial cells from tissue samples with histologic delay greater than or equal to 3 days consistent with luteal phase deficiency (LPD; group 1). Failure of PR down-regulation was associated with aberrant alpha v beta 3 integrin expression. Medical correction of LPD was associated with return of normal endometrial histology, normal integrin expression, and the loss of epithelial PR, similar to controls. The other two cycle-dependent integrin markers, alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 4 beta 1, were not different between groups. In women with aberrant alpha v beta 3 and ''in phase'' endometrium, epithelial PR expression was not different from controls. Conclusions: The establishment of normal endometrial receptivity appears to be tightly associated with the down-regulation of epithelial PR. Histologic delay, consistent with LPD, is associated with a failure of PR down-regulation and the lack, of normal markers of endometrial receptivity. Occult uterine receptivity defects (aberrant beta 3 expression in otherwise normal histology) are regulated differently, suggesting alternate mechanisms also exist which influence endometrial receptivity.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human Fallopian tube epithelium constitutively expresses integrin endometrial receptivity markers: no evidence for a tubal implantation window
    Brown, J. K.
    Shaw, J. L. V.
    Critchley, H. O. D.
    Horne, A. W.
    MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 18 (03) : 111 - 120
  • [22] Calcitonin is a progesterone regulated marker of uterine receptivity for implantation in the human.
    Kumar, S
    Zhu, LJ
    Polihornis, M
    Cameron, ST
    Baird, DT
    Schatz, F
    Dua, A
    Ying, YK
    Bagchi, MK
    Bagchi, IC
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1998, 58 : 120 - 120
  • [23] Implantation and uterine receptivity
    Horcajadas, JA
    Domínguez, F
    Martín, J
    Pellicer, A
    Simón, C
    ADVANCES IN FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 1266 : 177 - 182
  • [24] MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR THE WINDOW OF UTERINE RECEPTIVITY TO IMPLANTATION IN THE CYCLING NONHUMAN PRIMATE
    ANDERSON, TL
    SIMON, JA
    HODGEN, GD
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1986, 103 (05): : A463 - A463
  • [25] Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation
    Ma, WG
    Song, H
    Das, SK
    Paria, BC
    Dey, SK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (05) : 2963 - 2968
  • [26] Progesterone induces calcitonin expression in the baboon endometrium within the window of uterine receptivity
    Kumar, S
    Brudney, A
    Cheon, YP
    Fazleabas, AT
    Bagchi, IC
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 68 (04) : 1318 - 1323
  • [27] Effects of high progesterone in in-vitro fertilization cycle on DNA methylation of endometrium receptivity markers during implantation window
    Xiong, Y.
    Hu, L.
    Zhang, T.
    Xu, H.
    Wang, M.
    Sun, Y.
    Wang, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 109 - 110
  • [28] Uterine microbiome and endometrial receptivity
    Crha, I
    Ventruba, P.
    Zakova, J.
    Jeseta, M.
    Pilka, R.
    Lousova, E.
    Papikova, Z.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 84 (01): : 49 - 54
  • [29] Endometrial pinopodes and uterine receptivity
    Nikas, G
    Makrigiannakis, A
    WOMEN'S HEALTH AND DISEASE: GYNECOLOGIC AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES, 2003, 997 : 120 - 123
  • [30] Ultrastructural markers of tissue endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Melkozerova, O. A.
    Bashmakova, N. V.
    Malgina, G. B.
    Bragina, E. E.
    Michelson, A. A.
    Chistyakova, G. N.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 : 45 - 48