Joint Selection of SNPs for Improving Prediction in Genome-wide Association Studies

被引:0
|
作者
Bang, Seo-Jin [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Gang [1 ]
Park, Taesung [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Stat, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Genome-wide association study (GWAS); Welcome trust case control consotrium (WTCCC); bipolar disease; joint selection via elastic net; permuted p-value; PENALIZED LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; VARIABLE SELECTION; BIPOLAR DISORDER; ELASTIC-NET; ORACLE PROPERTIES; COMMON DISEASES; LASSO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
It is of great interest to select single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with diseases in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Since genetic variants affect diseases in multiple ways, the joint analysis of SNPs is needed to understand the full effects of genetic variants. However, since the number of SNPs is large and there exists linkage disequilibrium (LD) among SNPs, it is not easy to identify the joint effects of SNPs on complex traits. Thus, the multi-step approach is commonly used for handling these problems. First, SNPs marginally associated with diseases are selected via single SNP analysis. Next, joint identification of putative SNPs via penalized regularization method is carried out for the pre-selected SNP set. Finally, SNPs from the joint identification step are ordered by a measure which is yielded from the joint analysis. Some current approaches have proposed scoring measures to select causal SNPs such as selection stabilities and effect sizes. In this paper, we discuss some pros and cons of these measures and propose new joint SNP selection measures based on re-sampling methods such as permutation and bootstrap. We illustrate the joint SNP selection based on our measure by using bipolar disorder data from Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC). We demonstrate that the proposed method substantially improves the prediction of disease status compared to other scoring measures.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving the Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Gao, Guimin
    Kang, Guolian
    Fang, Yixin
    Woo, Jessica G.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 : S29 - S32
  • [42] Improving power in genome-wide association studies: Weights tip the scale
    Roeder, Kathryn
    Devlin, B.
    Wasserman, Larry
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (07) : 741 - 747
  • [43] Prioritized subset analysis: Improving power in genome-wide association studies
    Li, Chun
    Li, Mingyao
    Lange, Ethan M.
    Watanabe, Richard M.
    [J]. HUMAN HEREDITY, 2008, 65 (03) : 129 - 141
  • [44] GStream: Improving SNP and CNV Coverage on Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Alonso, Arnald
    Marsal, Sara
    Tortosa, Rauel
    Canela-Xandri, Oriol
    Julia, Antonio
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [45] Pulmonary Function: From Genome-Wide Association Studies to Genome-Wide Interaction Studies
    Christiani, David C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199 (05) : 557 - 559
  • [46] Structured Genome-Wide Association Studies with Bayesian Hierarchical Variable Selection
    Zhao, Yize
    Zhu, Hongtu
    Lu, Zhaohua
    Knickmeyer, Rebecca C.
    Zou, Fei
    [J]. GENETICS, 2019, 212 (02) : 397 - 415
  • [47] Genomic selection and genome-wide association studies in tetraploid chipping potatoes
    Pandey, Jeewan
    Scheuring, Douglas C.
    Koym, Jeffrey W.
    Endelman, Jeffrey B.
    Vales, M. Isabel
    [J]. PLANT GENOME, 2023, 16 (01):
  • [48] An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection
    Li, Hengde
    Su, Guosheng
    Jiang, Li
    Bao, Zhenmin
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49
  • [49] Statistical Power of Model Selection Strategies for Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Wu, Zheyang
    Zhao, Hongyu
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2009, 5 (07):
  • [50] Social determinants of health and selection bias in genome-wide association studies
    Riehm, Kira E. E.
    Keyes, Katherine M. M.
    Susser, Ezra S. S.
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 22 (01) : 160 - 161