GEOSPATIAL APPROACH FOR DELINEATING EXTRAPOLATION DOMAINS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES

被引:1
|
作者
Muthoni, Francis K. [1 ]
Baijukya, Frederick [2 ]
Sseguya, Haroon [3 ]
Bekunda, Mateete [1 ]
Hoeschle-Zeledon, Irmgard [4 ]
Ouko, Edward [5 ]
Mubea, Kenneth [5 ]
机构
[1] IITA, POB 10, Arusha, Tanzania
[2] IITA, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[3] IITA, Morogoro, Tanzania
[4] IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
[5] RCMRD, POB 632-00618, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
Extrapolation Suitability Index; correlation structure; inorganic fertilizers; GIS; improved maize varieties; scaling out; spatial targeting; Tanzania; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W2-145-2017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable intensification (SI) is a viable pathway to increase agricultural production and improve ecosystem health. Scaling SI technologies in locations with similar biophysical conditions enhance adoption. This paper employs novel extrapolation detection (ExeDet) algorithm and gridded bioclimatic layers to delineate extrapolation domains for improved maize variety (SC719) and inorganic fertilizers (YaraMila-CEREAL (R) and YaraBela-Sulfan (R)) in Tanzania. Suitability was based on grain yields recorded in on-farm trials. The ExeDet algorithm generated three maps: (1) the dissimilarity between bioclimatic conditions in the reference trial sites and the target extrapolation domain (Novelty type-1), (2) the magnitude of novel correlations between covariates in extrapolation domain (Novelty type-2) and (3) the most limiting covariate. The novelty type1 and 2 maps were intersected and reclassified into five suitability classes. These classes were cross-tabulated to generate extrapolation suitability index (ESI) for the candidate technology package. An impact based spatial targeting index (IBSTI) was used to identify areas within the zones earmarked as suitable using ESI where the potential impacts for out scaling interventions can be maximized. Application of ESI and IBSTI is expected to guide extension and development agencies to prioritize scaling intervention based on both biophysical suitability and potential impact of particular technology package. Annual precipitation was most limiting factor in largest area of the extrapolation domain. Identification of the spatial distribution of the limiting factor is useful for recommending remedial measures to address the limiting factor that hinder a technology to achieve its full potential. The method outlined in this paper is replicable to other technologies that require extrapolation provided that representative reference trial data and appropriate biophysical grids are available.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 149
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The adoption of sustainable agricultural technologies.
    Howard, I
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 1998, 11 (02): : 155 - 158
  • [32] Agricultural Innovization: An Optimization-Driven solution for sustainable agricultural intensification in Michigan
    Kropp, Ian
    Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan
    Jha, Prakash
    Hernandez-Suarez, J. Sebastian
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 199
  • [33] Special issue of agricultural economics (March 2006) on "Sustainable agricultural intensification" - Foreword
    Lee, DR
    Barrett, CB
    McPeak, JG
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (02) : 121 - 121
  • [34] Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies for Sustainable Development: A Review of Applications
    Acharya, Tri Dev
    Lee, Dong Ha
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2019, 31 (11) : 3931 - 3945
  • [35] A theoretical model of agrobiodiversity as a supporting service for sustainable agricultural intensification
    Omer, Amani
    Pascual, Unai
    Russell, Noel
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (10) : 1926 - 1933
  • [36] AgroTutor: A Mobile Phone Application Supporting Sustainable Agricultural Intensification
    Laso Bayas, Juan Carlos
    Gardeazabal, Andrea
    Karner, Mathias
    Folberth, Christian
    Vargas, Luis
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Balkovic, Juraj
    Subash, Anto
    Saad, Moemen
    Delerce, Sylvain
    Crespo Cuaresma, Jesus
    Hlouskova, Jaroslava
    Molina-Maturano, Janet
    See, Linda
    Fritz, Steffen
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Govaerts, Bram
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 10
  • [37] Sustainable Development Agricultural Economics and Policy: Intensification versus Diversification
    Hoshide, Aaron Kinyu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [38] Sustainable intensification and ecosystem services: new directions in agricultural governance
    Robert Fish
    Michael Winter
    Matt Lobley
    Policy Sciences, 2014, 47 : 51 - 67
  • [39] Insights into Brazilian agricultural structure and sustainable intensification of food production
    Rech, Elibio L.
    Lopes, Mauro R.
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2012, 1 (02): : 77 - 80
  • [40] Surveying the Evidence on Sustainable Intensification Strategies for Smallholder Agricultural Systems
    Jain, Meha
    Barrett, Christopher B.
    Solomon, Divya
    Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2023, 48 : 347 - 369