Dental Implants with Conical Implant-Abutment Interface: Influence of the Conical Angle Difference on the Mechanical Behavior of the Implant

被引:22
|
作者
Aguirrebeitia, Josu [1 ]
Abasolo, Mikel [1 ]
Vallejo, Javier [1 ]
Ansola, Ruben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, ETSI BILBAO, Dept Mech Engn, Bilbao 48013, Spain
关键词
conical angle difference; conical implant; finite element model; sensitivity study; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; BACTERIAL LEAKAGE; PROSTHESIS; COMPONENTS; SYSTEM; DOGS; FIT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.2775
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Misfit in the conical implant-abutment interface plays an important role on the mechanical behavior of the implant when masticatory forces are applied. The origin of the misfit adopted in this work is a conical angle difference between implant and abutment, which can be due to a combination of design decisions and manufacturing tolerances. The goal of this work was to investigate the effects of the implant-abutment conical angle difference in the following mechanical features: interfacial microgap, preload loss on the bolt, stress level in the bone, and abutment removal force and/or torque. Materials and Methods: A simplified three-dimensional nonlinear monoparametric finite element model of an OsseoSpeed TX 4.5 S 9-mm implant (Astra Tech) with a tapered implant-abutment interface was built to evaluate the variability of the mechanical features cited above with the conical angle difference, keeping constant the overall geometry, load and boundary conditions, material properties, frictional behavior, and mesh structure. Results: As the conical angle difference increased, the following effects were observed: the microgap decreased and remained almost constant for values over a given positive angle difference, the stress level in the bone increased sensitively, the removal force and/or torque needed to separate the abutment from the implant varied slightly, and the bolt preload loss increased. Conclusions: In light of the results provided, the conical angle difference in the implant-abutment interface had a significant influence on the overall mechanical behavior of the implant. Among the four mechanical features considered, the interfacial microgap and the bone stress were demonstrated to be the most sensitive to the conical angle difference, and therefore the most relevant when selecting an optimum value in the design process of a conical interface.
引用
收藏
页码:E72 / E82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fracture Resistance of Internal Conical and External Hexagon: Regular and Narrow Implant-Abutment Assemblies
    Prado Naves Carneiro, Thiago de Almeida
    Dietrich, Lia
    Prudente, Marcel Santana
    da Silva Neto, Joao Paulo
    do Prado, Celio Jesus
    de Araujo, Cleudmar Amaral
    das Neves, Flavio Domingues
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (04) : 510 - 514
  • [32] Fluid penetration in conical and screwed implant-abutment connections: An in vitro study at stereomicroscopy and SEM
    Jezzi, G
    Mangano, C
    Traini, T
    Fanali, S
    Petrone, G
    Orsini, G
    Scarano, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1246 - 1246
  • [33] Effects of Dental Implant-abutment Interfaces on the Reliability of Implant Systems
    Zhang, Xiao
    Liu, Lei
    Wang, Yaling
    Chen, Xianshuai
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MECHATRONICS RESEARCH (ICMMR 2016), 2016, 77
  • [34] Histology of a dental implant with a platform switched implant-abutment connection
    Degidi, Marco
    Perrotti, Vittoria
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Shibli, Jamil A.
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2011, 3 (03) : 56 - 60
  • [35] Microgap Formation in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections Under Oblique Loading: Influence of Cone Angle Mismatch Through Finite Element Analysis
    Gantier-Takano, Marlene Kasumi
    Xing, Yiyun
    Ye, Ning
    Aparicio, Conrado
    Cuellar, Carlos Navarro
    Meira, Josete Barbosa Cruz
    Fok, Alex Siu Lun
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [36] Candida spp colonization of the dental implant-abutment interface: An in vitro study
    Calcaterra, R.
    Di Girolamo, M.
    Mirisola, C.
    Baggi, L.
    MYCOSES, 2012, 55 : 80 - 81
  • [37] Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface
    Broggini, N
    McManus, LM
    Hermann, JS
    Medina, R
    Schenk, RK
    Buser, D
    Cochran, DL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (05) : 473 - 478
  • [38] Influence of connection geometry on dynamic micromotion at the implant-abutment interface
    Meng, Joe C.
    Everts, Joshua E.
    Qian, Fang
    Gratton, David G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2007, 20 (06) : 623 - 625
  • [39] The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading
    Queiroz, Daher Antonio
    Hagee, Natalia
    Lee, Damian J.
    Zheng, Fengyuan
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (02): : 211 - 216
  • [40] Biomechanical effects of the implant material and implant-abutment interface in immediately loaded small-diameter implants
    Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
    Huang, Heng-Li
    Hsu, Jui-Ting
    Chee, Winston
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 18 (04) : 1335 - 1341