Technoeconomic Analysis of a Hybrid Biomass Thermochemical and Electrochemical Conversion System

被引:6
|
作者
Dang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Mark Mba [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wenzhen [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Bioecon Inst, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
biomass; electrochemistry; fuel cells; pyrolysis; technoeconomic analysis; ANION-EXCHANGE MEMBRANE; FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL; FUEL-CELL; POWER-GENERATION; ANODE CATALYSTS; COST; ELECTRICITY; GLYCEROL; GLUCOSE;
D O I
10.1002/ente.201700395
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study explores an integrated biomass conversion system based on a common fast pyrolysis step and two subsequent bio-oil upgrading pathways. The two options are bio-oil thermochemical upgrading to drop-in transportation biofuels through hydrotreating and hydrocracking, and bio-oil electrochemical conversion for electrical power generation using a direct bio-oil fuel cell method. The technoeconomic performances of biomass-to-biofuels and biomass-to-electricity pathways are first examined individually, and then integrated for the analysis of a hybrid biomass conversion system. A biomass facility of 2000 tonnes per day is investigated as a baseline. The minimum fuel-selling price (MFSP) is estimated to be $2.48 per gallon, with biomass feedstock and other operating costs as major contributors. A very high minimum electricity-selling price (MESP) of $5.36 per kWh is projected based on the current laboratory-scale fuel cell configuration. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the effective reactant content in bio-oil, the degree of oxidation, and the fuel cell system efficiency play key roles in the MESP. The estimate can be reduced to $0.96 per kWh if target values of the three parameters are met. The results of the hybrid system suggest that the MESP can be reduced substantially from $0.96 to $0 per kWh when the hybrid system increases the bio-oil fraction for biofuel production from 0 to 75.8%, given a biofuel MFSP of $3 per gallon.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 187
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recent advancement in thermochemical conversion of biomass to biofuel
    Lim, Huei Yeong
    Rashidi, Nor Adilla
    Othman, Muhamad Farhan Haqeem
    Ismail, Intan Syafiqah
    Saadon, Syazmi Zul Arif Hakimi
    Chin, Bridgid Lai Fui
    Yusup, Suzana
    Rahman, Mohammad Nurizat
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2024, 15 (05): : 587 - 604
  • [32] Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: A review
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Lin, Bo-Jhih
    Huang, Ming-Yueh
    Chang, Jo-Shu
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 184 : 314 - 327
  • [33] Thermochemical conversion of residual biomass to hydrogen for Turkey
    Sürmen, Y
    Demirbas, A
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES, 2002, 24 (05): : 403 - 411
  • [34] A Review of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Biomass to Biofuels
    Jha, Shivangi
    Nanda, Sonil
    Acharya, Bishnu
    Dalai, Ajay K.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (17)
  • [35] Biochemical vs. Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass
    Weimer, Alan W.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2008, 104 (12) : 4 - 5
  • [36] Thermochemical conversion of biomass intermediates to fuels/chemicals
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 245
  • [37] ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS IN THERMOCHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CONVERSION OF BIOMASS
    FRINGS, RM
    HUNTER, IR
    MACKIE, KL
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1992, 2 (1-6): : 263 - 278
  • [38] Finite-time energy conversion in a hybrid cycle combining electrochemical, combustion and thermochemical
    Diskin, David
    Tartakovsky, Leonid
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 262
  • [39] Technoeconomic analysis of hybrid energy system for health clinic in Salalah Oman
    Okonkwo, Paul C.
    Barhoumi, El Manaa
    Mansir, Ibrahim B.
    Ogunleye, Gbenga Joshua
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 444 - 447
  • [40] Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels: Process development and technoeconomic evaluation
    Sen, S. Murat
    Henao, Carlos A.
    Braden, Drew J.
    Dumesic, James A.
    Maravelias, Christos T.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2012, 67 (01) : 57 - 67