Quantifying impacts on the measurement uncertainty in flow calibration arising from dynamic flow effects

被引:14
|
作者
Engel, Rainer [1 ]
Baade, Hans-Joachim [2 ]
机构
[1] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, Dept Liquid Flow, Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Droge Baade Drescher Consulting Engineers, Salzgitter, Germany
关键词
Liquid flow calibration; Fluctuation of process parameters; Measurement uncertainty analysis; Traceability in fluid flow; Element-by-element chain of traceability; Dynamic system behavior;
D O I
10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.11.003
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Traceability of the measurement units in fluid flow metering, as the state-of-the-art approach, is practiced as a so-called element-by-element method which relies upon the idealistic assumption that the measurement process in a flow calibration facility can be run under exact steady-state conditions, that is, absolutely no fluctuations of the flow quantities are assumed to occur during the flow measurement process. Practical experiences, combined with a model-based analytical view of the measurement process in a flow standard, have revealed that dynamic impacts on the measurement uncertainty due to flowrate fluctuations have to be taken into account, in addition to the steady-state traceability chain. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty analysis of hydrocarbon flow calibration facility (1st report, uncertainty analysis of flow measurement)
    Shimada, Takashi
    Doihara, Ryouji
    Takeda, Kazuhide
    Terao, Yoshiya
    Takamoto, Masaki
    [J]. Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, B Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, 2005, 71 (712): : 2956 - 2963
  • [2] Quantifying uncertainty in environmental flow assessments
    Stewardson, Michael
    Rutherfurd, Ian
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 10 (02): : 151 - 159
  • [3] Impact of Pitot tube calibration on the uncertainty of water flow rate measurement
    Buscarini, Icaro de Oliveira
    Barsaglini, Andre Costa
    Saiz Jabardo, Paulo Jose
    Taira, Nilson Massami
    Nader, Gilder
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MECHANICAL METROLOGY (CIMMEC2014), 2015, 648
  • [4] Measurement uncertainty in the calibration of low-flow ambient air samplers
    Wulff, SS
    Weitz, MA
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 21 (06) : 605 - 619
  • [5] Quantifying local flow direction uncertainty
    O'Neil, Glenn
    Shortridge, Ashton
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 27 (07) : 1292 - 1311
  • [6] Estimating uncertainty of flow measurement for the in-situ calibration of large water meters
    Johnson, E. H.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES, 2007, 11 (01): : 41 - 52
  • [7] Quantifying Information Flow for Dynamic Secrets
    Mardziel, Piotr
    Alvim, Mario S.
    Hicks, Michael
    Clarkson, Michael R.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2014), 2014, : 540 - 555
  • [8] EFFECTS OF MOLECULAR FLOW IN A DYNAMIC GAUGE-CALIBRATION SYSTEM
    PRIESTLA.C
    FLETCHER, B
    WATTS, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 4 (05): : 340 - &
  • [9] Effects of Upstream Turbulence on Measurement Uncertainty of Flow Rate by Venturi
    Lee, Jungho
    Yoon, Seok Ho
    Yu, Cheong-Hwan
    Park, Sang-Jin
    Chung, Chang-Hwan
    [J]. 10TH ASIAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLUID MACHINERY, 2010, 1225 : 550 - +
  • [10] Assessment of alternative fluid calibration to estimate traceable liquefied hydrogen flow measurement uncertainty
    Gugole, Federica
    Schakel, Menne D.
    Druzhkov, Aleksandr
    Brugman, Maarten
    [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 77 : 1056 - 1065