Speaking of Parties Dueling Views in a Canonical Measure of Sophistication

This article investigates fallout from a subtle but important conceptual disagreement over the nature of political parties that challenges a key measure of mass political sophistication. The American Voters typology assumes that sophisticated citizens notice the ideological abstractions defining parties. Alternatively, The Party Decides defines parties as group-based coalitions. The distinction is crucial for the levels of conceptualization measure, which considers ideological party views superior to group-oriented ones. Few people make ideological remarks about parties; many more describe links between parties and groups. Converse and colleagues take the scarcity of ideologues as evidence against mass sophistication, but a measure that might classify Party Decidestype comments in a lower tier may be invalid. How many citizens are misclassified? I parse decades of survey data to test whether sophistication in some group-centric citizens has gone unrecognized. It hasnt. Despite the conceptual threat, several tests show no evidence of hidden sophistication among these respondents overall or in subgroups, affirming the measures rank-order. Group-centric citizens are right about parties, but even their brightest are no ideologues.