Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors-As Mitigation Tools for Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Sustainable Dairy Systems: A Review

被引:91
|
作者
Byrne, Maria P. [1 ,2 ]
Tobin, John T. [1 ]
Forrestal, Patrick J. [3 ]
Danaher, Martin [4 ]
Nkwonta, Chikere G. [4 ]
Richards, Karl [3 ]
Cummins, Enda [2 ]
Hogan, Sean A. [1 ]
O'Callaghan, Tom F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Food Res Ctr, Food Chem & Technol Dept, Moorepk, Cork P61 C996, Co Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Biosyst & Food Engn, Agr & Food Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] TEAGASC, Johnstown Castle Y35 Y521, Co Wexford, Ireland
[4] TEAGASC, Food Safety Dept, Ashtown Food Res Ctr, Dublin 15, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Food & Nutr Sci, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland
关键词
urease inhibitors; nitrification inhibitors; greenhouse gas emissions; dairy sustainability; residual food contaminants; nitrous oxide; ammonia gas; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; CALCIUM AMMONIUM-NITRATE; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; N-(N-BUTYL) THIOPHOSPHORIC TRIAMIDE; LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; DICYANDIAMIDE DCD; 3,4-DIMETHYLPYRAZOLE PHOSPHATE; INFANT FORMULA; N2O EMISSIONS; SOIL;
D O I
10.3390/su12156018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Currently, nitrogen fertilizers are utilized to meet 48% of the total global food demand. The demand for nitrogen fertilizers is expected to grow as global populations continue to rise. The use of nitrogen fertilizers is associated with many negative environmental impacts and is a key source of greenhouse and harmful gas emissions. In recent years, urease and nitrification inhibitors have emerged as mitigation tools that are presently utilized in agriculture to prevent nitrogen losses and reduce greenhouse and harmful gas emissions that are associated with the use of nitrogen-based fertilizers. Both classes of inhibitor work by different mechanisms and have different physiochemical properties. Consequently, each class must be evaluated on its own merits. Although there are many benefits associated with the use of these inhibitors, little is known about their potential to enter the food chain, an event that may pose challenges to food safety. This phenomenon was highlighted when the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide was found as a residual contaminant in milk products in 2013. This comprehensive review aims to discuss the uses of inhibitor technologies in agriculture and their possible impacts on dairy product safety and quality, highlighting areas of concern with regards to the introduction of these inhibitor technologies into the dairy supply chain. Furthermore, this review discusses the benefits and challenges of inhibitor usage with a focus on EU regulations, as well as associated health concerns, chemical behavior, and analytical detection methods for these compounds within milk and environmental matrices.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New York Dairy Manure Management Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Costs (1992-2022)
    Wightman, Jenifer L.
    Woodbury, Peter B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2016, 45 (01) : 266 - 275
  • [42] Modelling the efficacy and profitability of mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions on pastoral dairy farms in New Zealand
    Beukes, P. C.
    Gregorini, P.
    Romera, A. J.
    Levy, G.
    Waghorn, G. C.
    18TH WORLD IMACS CONGRESS AND MODSIM09 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: INTERFACING MODELLING AND SIMULATION WITH MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 635 - 641
  • [43] Characterization and mitigation option of greenhouse gas emissions from lactating Holstein dairy cows in East China
    Peng Jia
    Yan Tu
    Zhihao Liu
    Qi Lai
    Fadi Li
    Lifeng Dong
    Qiyu Diao
    Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 13
  • [44] Optimizing ration formulation as a strategy for greenhouse gas mitigation in intensive dairy production systems
    Hawkins, James
    Weersink, Alfons
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    Fox, Glenn
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 137 : 1 - 11
  • [45] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland
    Kaparaju, P.
    Rintala, J.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [46] Feasibility of mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the UK. A systematic review
    Jebari, Asma
    Pereyra-Goday, Fabiana
    Kumar, Atul
    Collins, Adrian L.
    Rivero, M. Jordana
    McAuliffe, Graham A.
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [47] Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector-A Review
    Panchasara, Heena
    Samrat, Nahidul Hoque
    Islam, Nahina
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 16
  • [48] Energy optimization and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation for agricultural and horticultural systems in Northern Iran
    Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Soheilifard, Farshad
    Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh
    Chau, Kwok-Wing
    ENERGY, 2019, 186
  • [49] Beneficial management practices and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the agriculture of the Canadian Prairie: a review
    Asgedom, Haben
    Kebreab, Ermias
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (03) : 433 - 451
  • [50] Beneficial management practices and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the agriculture of the Canadian Prairie: a review
    Haben Asgedom
    Ermias Kebreab
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 31 : 433 - 451