Regression correlation coefficient for a Poisson regression model

被引:10
|
作者
Takahashi, Akihito [1 ]
Kurosawa, Takeshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Sci, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Math Informat Sci, Tokyo 162, Japan
[2] Tokyo Univ Sci, Fac Sci, Dept Math Informat Sci, Tokyo 162, Japan
关键词
Regression correlation coefficient; Measure of predictive power; Multiple correlation coefficient; Goodness of fit; Generalized linear model; Poisson regression model; GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS; PREDICTIVE POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2015.12.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study examines measures of predictive power for a generalized linear model (GLM). Although many measures of predictive power for GLMs have been proposed, most have limitations. Hence, we focus on the regression correlation coefficient (RCC) (Zheng and Agresti, 2000), which satisfies the four requirements of (i) interpretability, (ii) applicability, (iii) consistency, and (iv) affinity. The RCC is a population value that is defined by the correlation between a response variable and the conditional expectation of the response variable. Its sample value is defined by the sample correlation between the observed response values and estimated values of the response variable. For an arbitrary GLM, we do not always have an explicit form of the RCC. However, for a Poisson regression model, assuming that the predictor variables have a multivariate normal distribution, we can find the explicit form of the RCC (true value). Therefore, it is possible to compare the estimators (sample values) of the RCC in terms of bias and RMSE (root of the mean square error) by using the true value. Furthermore, by using the explicit form, we propose a new estimator of the RCC for the Poisson regression model. We then compare the new estimator with the sample correlation estimator, the jack-knife estimator, and the leave-one-out cross validation estimator in terms of bias and RMSE. The leave-one-out cross validation estimator has large negative bias and large RMSE. Although the remaining three estimators show similar behavior for a large sample size, for a small sample size the new estimator shows the best behavior in terms of bias and RMSE. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SHRINKAGE AND PENALTY ESTIMATORS OF A POISSON REGRESSION MODEL
    Hossain, Shakhawat
    Ahmed, Ejaz
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2012, 54 (03) : 359 - 373
  • [42] A New Ridge Estimator for the Poisson Regression Model
    Nadwa K. Rashad
    Zakariya Yahya Algamal
    [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 2019, 43 : 2921 - 2928
  • [43] A multivariate Poisson regression model for count data
    Munoz-Pichardo, J. M.
    Pino-Mejias, R.
    Garcia-Heras, J.
    Ruiz-Munoz, F.
    Luz Gonzalez-Regalado, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2021, 48 (13-15) : 2525 - 2541
  • [44] Overcoming Multicollinearity In Multiple Regression Using Correlation Coefficient
    Zainodin, H. J.
    Yap, S. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES AND STATISTICS 2013 (ICMSS2013), 2013, 1557 : 416 - 419
  • [45] Regression and standard error calculations without the correlation coefficient
    Bronfin, H
    Newhall, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1934, 25 : 634 - 636
  • [46] Determined Based on Multiple Linear Regression Model the Remaining Residuals Regression Coefficient
    Cui Yujie
    Guo Jiaming
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2012, : 49 - 51
  • [47] Understanding Poisson Regression
    Hayat, Matthew J.
    Higgins, Melinda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2014, 53 (04) : 208 - 216
  • [48] Robust Poisson regression
    Tsou, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (09) : 3173 - 3186
  • [49] MULTIPLE POISSON REGRESSION
    WEBER, DC
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1969, 25 (04) : 804 - &
  • [50] Overdispersion and Poisson Regression
    Richard Berk
    John M. MacDonald
    [J]. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2008, 24 : 269 - 284