Efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:29
|
作者
Xiang, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Di [1 ]
Du, Zhen [1 ]
Hao, Yongxiu [4 ]
Yan, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yonghui [1 ]
Liu, Yutong [1 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
Ping, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Urol, 1 Dongjiaomingxiang St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Big Data Based Precis Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Embolization; therapeutic; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Systematic review; Meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07663-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) vs. transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We also reviewed mean changes from baseline in PAE at selected follow-up points. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to May 1, 2020. Randomized controlled trials on PAE were collected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3, STATA 14, and GraphPad Prism 8. Pooled patient-reported scores and functional outcomes were calculated by using a fixed or random-effect model. Results Eleven articles met our selection criteria and ten independent patient series were included in the final analysis. Pooled estimates suggested no significant difference between TURP and PAE for patient-reported outcomes including International Prostate Symptom Score (2.32 (- 0.44 to 5.09)) and quality of life (0.18 (- 0.41 to 0.77)) at 12 months. PAE was less effective regarding improvements in most functional outcomes such as maximum flow rate, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen. Moreover, PAE may be associated with relatively fewer complications, lower cost, and shorter hospitalization. After the PAE procedure, the overall weighted mean differences for all outcomes except sexual health scores were significantly improved from baseline during follow-up to 24 months. Conclusion PAE is non-inferior to TURP with regard to improving patient-reported outcomes, though most functional parameters undergo more changes after TURP than after PAE. Moreover, PAE can significantly continue to relieve symptoms for 24 months without causing serious complications. Key Points PAE is as effective as TURP in improving subjective symptom scores, with fewer complications and shorter hospitalization times. PAE is inferior to TURP in the improvement of most functional outcomes. Improvements due to PAE are durable during follow-up to 24 months.
引用
收藏
页码:4929 / 4946
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Efficacy and Safety of HoLEP for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Large Volume: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Fengze
    Yao, Huibao
    Bao, Xingjun
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Wang, Di
    Zhang, Dongxu
    Zhou, Zhongbao
    Wu, Jitao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 16 (04)
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sung Ryul Shim
    Young Joo Cho
    In-Soo Shin
    Jae Heon Kim
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2016, 48 : 19 - 30
  • [23] The efficacy and safety of dutasteride and finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yao
    Ma, Jie
    Qin, Xin-Hua
    Hu, Chuan-Yi
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (03) : 313 - 324
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    Cho, Young Joo
    Shin, In-Soo
    Kim, Jae Heon
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 48 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [25] An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Xu, Zhunan
    Zhou, Zhongbao
    Mu, Yingmei
    Cai, Tong
    Gao, Zhenli
    Liu, Lingling
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization for large benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients
    Xu, Chen
    Zhang, Gang
    Wang, Jin-jin
    Zhou, Chun-xian
    Jiang, Min-jun
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (01)
  • [27] Prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    B. Malling
    M. A. Røder
    K. Brasso
    J. Forman
    M. Taudorf
    L. Lönn
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 287 - 298
  • [28] Prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Malling, B.
    Roder, M. A.
    Brasso, K.
    Forman, J.
    Taudorf, M.
    Lonn, L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 287 - 298
  • [29] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Prostatic Artery Embolization to Gold-Standard Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Gabriel M. Knight
    Abhinav Talwar
    Riad Salem
    Samdeep Mouli
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2021, 44 : 183 - 193
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Prostatic Artery Embolization to Gold-Standard Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Knight, Gabriel M.
    Talwar, Abhinav
    Salem, Riad
    Mouli, Samdeep
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (02) : 183 - 193