Efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:29
|
作者
Xiang, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Di [1 ]
Du, Zhen [1 ]
Hao, Yongxiu [4 ]
Yan, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yonghui [1 ]
Liu, Yutong [1 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
Ping, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Urol, 1 Dongjiaomingxiang St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Big Data Based Precis Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Embolization; therapeutic; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Systematic review; Meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07663-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) vs. transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We also reviewed mean changes from baseline in PAE at selected follow-up points. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to May 1, 2020. Randomized controlled trials on PAE were collected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3, STATA 14, and GraphPad Prism 8. Pooled patient-reported scores and functional outcomes were calculated by using a fixed or random-effect model. Results Eleven articles met our selection criteria and ten independent patient series were included in the final analysis. Pooled estimates suggested no significant difference between TURP and PAE for patient-reported outcomes including International Prostate Symptom Score (2.32 (- 0.44 to 5.09)) and quality of life (0.18 (- 0.41 to 0.77)) at 12 months. PAE was less effective regarding improvements in most functional outcomes such as maximum flow rate, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen. Moreover, PAE may be associated with relatively fewer complications, lower cost, and shorter hospitalization. After the PAE procedure, the overall weighted mean differences for all outcomes except sexual health scores were significantly improved from baseline during follow-up to 24 months. Conclusion PAE is non-inferior to TURP with regard to improving patient-reported outcomes, though most functional parameters undergo more changes after TURP than after PAE. Moreover, PAE can significantly continue to relieve symptoms for 24 months without causing serious complications. Key Points PAE is as effective as TURP in improving subjective symptom scores, with fewer complications and shorter hospitalization times. PAE is inferior to TURP in the improvement of most functional outcomes. Improvements due to PAE are durable during follow-up to 24 months.
引用
收藏
页码:4929 / 4946
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Peng Xiang
    Di Guan
    Zhen Du
    Yongxiu Hao
    Wei Yan
    Yonghui Wang
    Yutong Liu
    Dan Liu
    Hao Ping
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 4929 - 4946
  • [2] Comparative efficacy and safety of prostatic urethral lift vs prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lucas-Cava, Vanesa
    Miguel Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco
    Insausti-Gorbea, Inigo
    Sun, Fei
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 131 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [3] Meta-Analysis of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Uflacker, Andre
    Haskal, Ziv J.
    Bilhim, Tiago
    Patrie, James
    Huber, Timothy
    Pisco, Joao Martins
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (11) : 1686 - 1697
  • [5] Re: Prostate Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (03): : 745 - 745
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Ruixue
    Huang, Huiyuan
    Zhan, Sheng
    Yi, Lizhen
    Huang, Linxing
    Yue, Zenghui
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (08) : E37324
  • [7] Prostatic artery embolization in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Chiu, Peter K. F.
    Yee, Chi-Hang
    Wong, Hon-Ming
    Chan, Chi-Kwok
    Chan, Eddie S. Y.
    Hou, Simon S. M.
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [8] Prostatic artery embolization in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review
    Jeremy Y. C. Teoh
    Peter K. F. Chiu
    Chi-Hang Yee
    Hon-Ming Wong
    Chi-Kwok Chan
    Eddie S. Y. Chan
    Simon S. M. Hou
    Chi-Fai Ng
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 197 - 203
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ma, Chun Ho
    Lin, Wai Ling
    Lui, Sing Leung
    Cai, Xun-Yuan
    Wong, Vivian Taam
    Ziea, Eric
    Zhang, Zhang-Jin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (04) : 471 - 482
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of moxibustion for benign prostatic hyperplasia A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiaze
    Deng, Tingting
    Sun, Hao
    Sun, Xiaolu
    You, Yuwei
    Wang, Ying
    Xun, Qi
    Ma, Yuxia
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (51)