Perceived risk of lock-in in the front-end phase of major transportation projects

被引:5
|
作者
Cantarelli, Chantal C. [1 ]
Oglethorpe, David [2 ]
van Wee, Bert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Conduit Rd, Sheffield S10 1FL, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Cranfield, Beds, England
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Lock-in; Escalation of commitment; Path dependency; Decision-making; Risk perception; Major transportation projects; ORGANIZATIONAL PATH DEPENDENCE; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; Q-METHODOLOGY; DECISION-MAKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; CO-CREATION; ESCALATION; COMMITMENT; UNCERTAINTY; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11116-021-10191-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Lock-in is defined as the tendency to continue with an inefficient decision or project proposal. The front-end phase is critical to project success, yet most studies have focused on lock-in in the implementation phase. Moreover, little is known about the way in which decision-makers perceive the risk of lock-in. In this paper we identify determinants of lock-in in the front-end phase and we reveal decision-makers' perceptions of risk of lock-in. Our findings show that risk attitudes towards lock-in vary with the level of risk aversion. However, this is not sufficiently acute to drive the level of regret needed to avoid lock-in. This implies that decision-makers do not accurately assess the risk of lock-in and as such their risk perceptions are a mediating factor in the formation of lock-in. Based on escalation of commitment, path dependency, and prospect theory, the main contribution lies in providing a more comprehensive understanding of lock-in in the front-end phase.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 733
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic literature review on characteristics of the front-end phase of agile software development projects and their connections to project success
    Jorgensen, Magne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2024, 216
  • [32] Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects
    Matinheikki, Juri
    Artto, Karlos
    Peltokorpi, Antti
    Rajala, Risto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (07) : 1226 - 1241
  • [33] RECEIVER DESIGN CUTS FRONT-END PHASE ERRORS.
    Schmidt, Eric
    [J]. Microwaves and RF, 1985, 24 (06): : 81 - 82
  • [34] The effect of front-end vehicle height on pedestrian death risk
    Tyndall, Justin
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2024, 37
  • [35] The phase 1 upgrade of the CMS Pixel Front-End Driver
    Friedl, M.
    Pernicka, M.
    Steininger, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2010, 5
  • [36] Effect of LO Phase Noise on Front-end Receiver Performance
    Kumar, Manish
    Pal, T. K.
    Prasad, B. S. V.
    Kumar, G. Arun
    Bhanja, Sukhendu
    Majumder, Arijit
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATION, DEVICES AND NETWORKING, 2018, 462 : 439 - 445
  • [37] A low-risk path to becoming a front-end plumber
    Vicious, Kode
    [J]. Queue, 2019, 17 (04):
  • [38] Passive phase shifters and their applications in RF front-end circuits
    Kearns, Brian
    McDonald, Brendan
    Cunningham, Gerard
    [J]. 2007 EUROPEAN MICROWAVE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 893 - 896
  • [39] Managing projects front-end: Incorporating a strategic early view to project management with simulation
    Artto, Karlos A.
    Lehtonen, Juha-Matti
    Saranen, Juha
    [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, 19 (05) : 255 - 264
  • [40] Analyzing Interaction Dynamics at the Fuzzy Front-End of Innovation Projects: A Tool for Prospective Ergonomics
    Nelson, Julien
    Malon, Xavier
    Ferey, Nicolas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA 2018), VOL VII: ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, DESIGN FOR ALL, ACTIVITY THEORIES FOR WORK ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, AFFECTIVE DESIGN, 2019, 824 : 1001 - 1007