Evaluating management options for aquatic invasive species: concepts and methods

被引:11
|
作者
Homans, Frances R. [1 ]
Smith, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Economics; Management; Valuation methods; Invasive aquatic species; CARP CYPRINUS-CARPIO; COMMON CARP; VALUES; POPULATION; PREVENTION; BENEFITS; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s10530-011-0134-4
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In analyses that attempt to estimate the costs of species invasions, it has been typical to report the costs of management and/or to multiply per-unit costs by the number affected to arrive at a total. These estimates are of limited value for most policy questions. We start our discussion by recognizing that biological pollutants such as aquatic invasive species are like conventional pollutants in important ways and appeal to the well-developed literature on conventional pollution to guide our thinking into how best to conceptualize the problem. We use a standard pollution control framework to identify the margins over which costs and benefits should be estimated to guide wise decision-making. We then use examples from the literature to illustrate how transactions in related markets can be used to estimate the benefits of management. The roles of adaptation, mitigation, and species population growth have particular relevance and are highlighted. In the final section of the paper, we think through the conditions under which investing in genetic biocontrol methods would be economically justified.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a surveillance species list to inform aquatic invasive species management in the Laurentian Great Lakes
    Davidson, Alisha Dahlstrom
    Tucker, Andrew J.
    Chadderton, Lindsay W.
    Weibert, Cecilia
    MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2021, 12 (02): : 272 - 293
  • [22] Toxicity of Carbon Dioxide to Freshwater Fishes: Implications for Aquatic Invasive Species Management
    Cupp, Aaron R.
    Smerud, Justin R.
    Thomas, Linnea M.
    Waller, Diane L.
    Smith, David L.
    Erickson, Richard A.
    Gaikowski, Mark P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 39 (11) : 2247 - 2255
  • [23] Research priorities for aquatic invasive species
    不详
    FISHERIES, 2002, 27 (08) : 8 - 8
  • [24] Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future
    Havel, John E.
    Kovalenko, Katya E.
    Thomaz, Sidinei Magela
    Amalfitano, Stefano
    Kats, Lee B.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 750 (01) : 147 - 170
  • [25] Preface: Aquatic invasive species IV
    Thomaz, Sidinei M.
    Fauvelot, Cecile
    Kats, Lee B.
    Kotta, Jonne
    Pelicice, Fernando M.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2025, 852 (8-9) : 1987 - 1995
  • [26] Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future
    John E. Havel
    Katya E. Kovalenko
    Sidinei Magela Thomaz
    Stefano Amalfitano
    Lee B. Kats
    Hydrobiologia, 2015, 750 : 147 - 170
  • [27] Options for managing invasive marine species
    Thresher, RE
    Kuris, AM
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2004, 6 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [28] Evaluating spatially explicit management alternatives for an invasive species in a riverine network
    Thompson, Brielle K.
    Olden, Julian D.
    Converse, Sarah J.
    NEOBIOTA, 2024, 96 : 151 - 172
  • [29] Options for Managing Invasive Marine Species
    Ronald E. Thresher
    Armand M. Kuris
    Biological Invasions, 2004, 6 : 295 - 300
  • [30] Evaluating sampling bias correction methods for invasive species distribution modeling in Maxent
    Sorbe, Frederic
    Graenzig, Tobias
    Foerster, Michael
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 76