Study of the influence of operating parameters on boron removal by a reverse osmosis membrane

被引:26
|
作者
Kheriji, Jamel [1 ]
Mnif, Amine [1 ]
Bejaoui, Imen [1 ]
Hamrouni, Bechir [1 ]
机构
[1] Tunis El Manar Univ, Desalinat & Water Treatment Res Unit, Fac Sci Tunis, El Manar 2092 2, Tunisia
关键词
Boron; Reverse osmosis membrane type AG; Operating parameters; SEA-WATER; DESALINATION;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2014.968902
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Boron is a vital element for organism growth but excess of boron in water causes a problem due to its adverse effects on plants and humans. Hence, it is advisable to keep boron under specified harmless limits. However, removing boron from water is challenging. Also, it is not easily removed by a reverse osmosis membrane under natural conditions. In this paper, boron removal from aqueous solutions by the use of reverse osmosis membrane was investigated. The first objective of this work was to evaluate the characteristics of the AG-2514-TF (Osmonics) membrane used in boron permeation experiments. The next objective was to study the retention of boron by the AG membrane. The effect of several working parameters, such as pH, operating pressure, feed concentration, temperature, ionic strength, and other ions was studied in an attempt to achieve a higher removal capacity. The experimental results indicated that boron removal was dependent on the operating parameters. Indeed, boron can be effectively removed only at a pH of feed solution close to 11. To check the effectiveness of this process with the optimal operating parameters obtained, an application on underground water of Oued Bouthebane (Elfahs,Tunisia) was performed. Obtained results showed that the AG reverse osmosis membrane could be efficiently used (with 91.86% rejection) for the removal of boron from groundwater.
引用
收藏
页码:2653 / 2662
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of operating parameters on boron removal from seawater using membrane distillation process
    Boubakri, Ali
    Bouguecha, Salah Al-Tahar
    Dhaouadi, Imen
    Hafiane, Amor
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2015, 373 : 86 - 93
  • [32] Adsorption/co-precipitation-reverse osmosis system for boron removal
    Turek, Marian
    Dydo, Piotr
    Trojanowska, Jolanta
    Campen, Adam
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 205 (1-3) : 192 - 199
  • [33] Predicting the boron removal of reverse osmosis membranes using machine learning
    Sukarnoa
    Chong, Jeng Yi
    Cong, Gao
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2024, 586
  • [34] Impact of pH on the removal of fluoride, nitrate and boron by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis
    Richards, Laura A.
    Vuachere, Marion
    Schaefer, Andrea I.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2010, 261 (03) : 331 - 337
  • [35] Boron removal and its concentration by reverse osmosis in the presence of polyol compounds
    Dydo, Piotr
    Nems, Izabela
    Turek, Marian
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 89 : 171 - 180
  • [36] Boron removal from landfill leachate by means of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis
    Dydo, P
    Turek, M
    Ciba, J
    Trojanowska, J
    Kluczka, J
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2005, 185 (1-3) : 131 - 137
  • [37] Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane incorporated with UiO-66 nanoparticles for enhanced boron removal
    Liu, Lifen
    Xie, Xin
    Qi, Saren
    Li, Ruihan
    Zhang, Xiao
    Song, Xiaoxiao
    Gao, Congjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2019, 580 : 101 - 109
  • [38] Full-scale simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination processes for boron removal: Effect of membrane fouling
    Park, Pyung-Kyu
    Lee, Sangho
    Cho, Jae-Seok
    Kim, Jae-Hong
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (12) : 3796 - 3804
  • [39] Analysis of the influence of pH and pressure on the elimination of boron in reverse osmosis
    Prats, D
    Chillon-Arias, MF
    Rodriguez-Pastor, M
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2000, 128 (03) : 269 - 273
  • [40] Phenol removal from water by AG reverse osmosis membrane
    Mnif, Amine
    Tabassi, Dorra
    Ali, Mourad Ben Sik
    Hamrouni, Bechir
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2015, 34 (04) : 982 - 989