The influence of land titling on the disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay values

被引:10
|
作者
Zhu, Wenjue [1 ]
Paudel, Krishna P. [2 ,3 ]
Luo, Biliang [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Louisiana State Univ LSU, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] LSU Agr Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[4] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
美国农业部; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Instrumental variable; land titling; farmland transfer; WTA and WTP disparity; AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; CONSUMERS-SURPLUS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; CHOICE; EXPLANATION; ADOPTION; AVERSION; GROWTH; TENURE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2020.1796287
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Land titling, which aims to promote the transfer of farmland in China by providing property rights to landowners, may not be working as intended due to the presence of an endowment effect. The implications of the endowment effect are that it creates a substantial disparity between the willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) values for agricultural land parcels. An inflated WTA/WTP value hinders farmland transfer to those who have the comparative advantage in farmland management. We develop a conceptual model to understand the factors influencing the disparity between landowners' WTA/WTP values. The empirical model uses an IV-Tobit model on a dataset collected from a nationwide interview survey of Chinese peasant households in 2015-2016. Results show that land titling further increases the disparity between WTA and WTP after the endogeneity issue is resolved. The expectation of the Chinese government that land titling could promote land transfer may not be accurate if the psychological effect of landholding exerts dominance in the land market.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 953
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? Comment
    Amiran, EY
    Hagen, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01): : 458 - 463
  • [42] Anchoring effects on consumers' willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept
    Simonson, I
    Drolet, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (03) : 681 - 690
  • [43] Investigating Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Asymmetry in Choice Experiments
    Lanz, Bruno
    Provins, Allan
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    Willis, Ken
    Ozdemiroglu, Ece
    [J]. CHOICE MODELLING: THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND THE STATE-OF-PRACTICE, 2010, : 517 - 541
  • [44] WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY AND WILLINGNESS-TO-ACCEPT FOR RISKY AND AMBIGUOUS LOTTERIES
    EISENBERGER, R
    WEBER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1995, 10 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [45] Motivated Valuation: A Motivational Perspective on the Disparity between Willingness-to-Accepted and Willingness-to-Pay
    Espinoza, Francine
    Srivastava, Joydeep
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL XXXVII, 2010, 37 : 614 - 615
  • [46] The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap: A failed replication of Plott and Zeiler
    Fehr, Dietmar
    Hakimov, Rustamdjan
    Kuebler, Dorothea
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 78 : 120 - 128
  • [47] Convergence theorems of willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for nonmarket goods
    Mitsunobu Miyake
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2010, 34 : 549 - 570
  • [48] Convergence theorems of willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for nonmarket goods
    Miyake, Mitsunobu
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2010, 34 (04) : 549 - 570
  • [49] The effect of knowledge on the disparity between hypothetical and real willingness to pay
    Paradiso, M
    Trisorio, A
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2001, 33 (11) : 1359 - 1364
  • [50] Relationship between Objective and Subjective Atmospheric Visibility and Its Influence on Willingness to Accept or Pay in China
    Yu, Kangkang
    Chen, Zhenghao
    Gao, Jian
    Zhang, Yuechong
    Wang, Shulan
    Chai, Fahe
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):