Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: their development after decades of research

被引:4
|
作者
Castro, Angela [1 ]
Prat, Montserrat [1 ]
Gorgorio, Noria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Ciencias Educ, Dept Didact Matemat & Ciencias Expt, Bellaterra 08193, Barcelona, Spain
来源
REVISTA DE EDUCACION | 2016年 / 374期
关键词
conceptual knowledge; procedural knowledge; procedural flexibility; research on mathematics education; mathematical domains; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CHILDRENS ADDITION; ADAPTIVE EXPERTISE; INVERSE RELATION; NUMBER WORDS; SUBTRACTION; FLEXIBILITY; PRINCIPLES; SKILL; MULTIPLICATION;
D O I
10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2016-374-325
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics has been an object of interest and focus of debate throughout the years. In the literature it is possible to find discussions that address topics ranging from which should be further developed in school -the skills or the procedures-to proposals about how to study interactions between both types of knowledge. This paper analyses the current situation in the field by reviewing the most relevant characterisations in the literature for both types of knowledge, the reasons that led to changes in research focus, the current problems and the open lines of research. In turn, it contributes a summary-table of the most significant studies in the literature of each type of knowledge focusing on the mathematical domain to which they belong. The papers consulted suggest that early studies about conceptual and procedural knowledge focused on children, while later they spread to adolescents, young adults and pre-service teachers. Initially, research on types of knowledge mainly focused on the counting domains, single-and multi-digit addition, fractions and proportional reasoning; trying, in most cases, to determine the acquisition order of the concepts versus skills. Over the years, the interest in these two types of knowledge has increased, and its study has spread to other mathematical domains, such as equations, principles of addition and subtraction, multiplication and division. Nevertheless, it is observed in this work that, after decades of research, there is no consensus about how to define and measure the conceptual and procedural knowledge with an adequate validity level.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 66
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: An Effectiveness Study on GeoGebra Software
    Hutkemri
    Zamri, Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed
    Zakaria, Effendi
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (03) : 2079 - 2082
  • [42] Linking procedural and conceptual mathematical knowledge through CAL
    Kadijevich, D
    Haapasalo, L
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2001, 17 (02) : 156 - 165
  • [43] Examining the effects of writing on conceptual and procedural knowledge in calculus
    Porter M.K.
    Masingila J.O.
    Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2000, 42 (2) : 165 - 177
  • [44] A paradigm for assessing conceptual and procedural knowledge in engineering students
    Taraban, Roman
    DeFinis, Alli
    Brown, Ashlee G.
    Anderson, Edward E.
    Sharma, M. P.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) : 335 - 345
  • [45] Paradigm for Coupling Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Companion Systems
    Schiller, Marvin
    Behnke, Gregor
    Schmautz, Mario
    Bercher, Pascal
    Kraus, Matthias
    Dorna, Michael
    Minker, Wolfgang
    Glimm, Birte
    Biundo, Susanne
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPANION TECHNOLOGY (ICCT), 2017,
  • [46] Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum: Student Conceptions and Performance
    Engelbrecht, Johann
    Bergsten, Christer
    Kagesten, Owe
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 101 (01) : 138 - 162
  • [47] Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: views of qualified engineers*
    Engelbrecht J.
    Bergsten C.
    Kågesten O.
    Bergsten, Christer (christer.bergsten@liu.se), 1600, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (42): : 570 - 586
  • [48] Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy
    Schmittau, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2004, 19 (01) : 19 - 43
  • [49] Inducing mental set constrains procedural flexibility and conceptual understanding in mathematics
    Marci S. DeCaro
    Memory & Cognition, 2016, 44 : 1138 - 1148
  • [50] Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy
    Jean Schmittau
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2004, 19 : 19 - 43