Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings

被引:119
|
作者
Nadoushani, Zahra S. Moussavi [1 ]
Akbarnezhad, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Life cycle carbon; Embodied carbon; Structural materials; Lateral load resisting systems; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; THERMAL MASS; CO2; EMISSION; CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETE; STRATEGIES; BALANCES; STEEL; WOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.044
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The criteria used conventionally in selection of structural system characteristics include mainly performance related and economic criteria and the environmental impacts including life cycle carbon footprint are rarely taken into consideration. This paper highlights the importance of considering the life cycle carbon footprint in selection of the structural system for buildings by illustrating the significant effect that variations in the structural system characteristics including type of the lateral load resisting system, material and height of the structure may have on the carbon footprint of structures. A set of 15 alternative steel and concrete structural systems including moment resisting frames, braced frames, shear wall systems and dual systems are designed for 3, 10 and 15 storey buildings. The carbon footprint of each individual design is estimated by considering the emissions incurred in material extraction, transportation, construction, operation and end-of-life phases using a computational method. The results indicate considerable differences between the life cycle carbon of different structural systems and between the carbon emissions incurred in different life cycle phases of a particular structural system, confirming the importance of considering the life cycle carbon footprint in selection of structural system characteristics. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon Footprint of a Port Infrastructure from a Life Cycle Approach
    Saravia de los Reyes, Rodrigo
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Gonzalo
    Esteban, Maria Dolores
    Rodriguez, Raul Ruben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (20) : 1 - 16
  • [32] A life-cycle carbon footprint of Yosemite National Park
    Villalba, Gara
    Tarnay, Leland
    Campbell, Elliott
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1336 - 1343
  • [33] Carbon footprint inventory using life cycle energy analysis
    Ching-Feng Chen
    S. K. Chen
    [J]. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 2024, 11 : 107 - 122
  • [34] Product carbon footprint for product life cycle under uncertainty
    He, Bin
    Pan, Qijun
    Deng, Zhongqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 : 459 - 472
  • [35] The Effects of Structural Lightweight Concrete on Energy Performance and Life Cycle Cost in Residential Buildings
    Nayir, Safa
    Bahadir, Umit
    Erdogdu, Sakir
    Togan, Vedat
    [J]. PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 65 (02): : 500 - 509
  • [36] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [37] Life cycle water footprint and carbon footprint analysis of municipal sludge plasma gasification process
    Cui, Peizhe
    Xu, Zaifeng
    Yao, Dong
    Qi, Huaqing
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Yang, Sheng
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [38] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    Mengyang He
    Yang Wang
    Haotian Ma
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [39] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    He, Mengyang
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Haotian
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [40] Carbon footprint benchmarking data for buildings
    Collings, David
    [J]. Structural Engineer, 2020, 98 (11): : 10 - 13