Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Salvage of Prior Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:78
|
作者
Katsargyris, A. [1 ]
Yazar, O. [1 ,2 ]
Oikonomou, K. [1 ]
Bekkema, F. [3 ]
Tielliu, I. [3 ]
Verhoeven, E. L. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Nurnberg, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, D-90471 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Vasc Surg, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Div Vasc Surg, Dept Surg, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Aneurysm; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Fenestrated; Juxtarenal; Migration; Type I endoleak; EVAR; CONVERSION; ENDOLEAK; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.03.028
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To review our experience with fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) to treat complications after previous standard infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A prospectively maintained database including all consecutive patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm that were treated with F-EVAR after failed previous EVAR within the period March 2002 to November 2012 at the University Medical Center of Groningen, Netherlands (up to October 2009), and the Klinikum Nurnberg Sud, Germany (from November 2009) was analyzed. Evaluated outcomes included initial technical success, operative mortality and morbidity, and late procedure-related events with regard to survival, target vessel patency, endoleak, renal function, and reintervention. Results: A total of 26 patients (24 male, mean age 73.2 +/- 6.5 years) were treated. All patients had proximal anatomies precluding endovascular reintervention with standard techniques. In 23 patients a fenestrated proximal cuff was used, and in three patients a bifurcated fenestrated stent graft. Technical success was achieved in 24 (92.3%) patients. One patient required on-table open conversion because of impossibility to retrieve the top cap as a result of twist of the ipsilateral limb. In the second patient the right kidney was lost due to inadvertent stenting in a smaller branch of the renal artery. Catheterization difficulties, all related to the passage through the limbs or struts of the previous stent graft, were encountered in 11 (42.3%) cases, including five (19.2%) patients with iliac access problems and six (23.1%) with challenging renal catheterization. Operative target vessel perfusion success rate was 94.6% (70/74). Operative mortality was 0%. Mean follow-up was 26.8 +/- 28.5 months. No proximal type I endoleak was present on first postoperative CTA. The mean aneurysm maximal diameter decreased from 73 20 mm to 66.7 +/- 21 mm (p < .05). There were six late deaths, one of them aneurysm related. Estimated survival rates at land 2 years were 94.1 +/- 5.7% and 87.4 +/- 8.4%, respectively. Patency during follow-up for the target vessels treated successfully with a fenestrated stent graft was 100% (70/70). Reintervention was required in four cases, including one acute conversion due to rupture, one for iliac limb occlusion and two for type Ib and II endoleak. Renal function deterioration was observed solely in the two cases of primary technical failure. Conclusions: F-EVAR represents a feasible option for the repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm after prior EVAR failure. It is advantageous in terms of mortality and less morbid than open surgery, but is associated with increased technical challenges because of the previously placed stent graft. Outcome seems related to initial technical success. (C) 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salvage of failed prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with fenestrated endovascular stent grafts
    Adam, Donald J.
    Fitridge, Robert A.
    Berce, Michael
    Hartley, David E.
    Anderson, John L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (06) : 1341 - 1344
  • [2] Comparison of the fixation strength of standard and fenestrated Stent-Grafts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Zhou, Samuel S. N.
    How, Thien V.
    Vallabhaneni, S. Rao
    Gilling-Smith, Geoffrey L.
    Brennan, John A.
    Harris, Peter L.
    McWilliams, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (02) : 168 - 175
  • [3] Comparison of Blood Flow in Branched and Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Kandail, Harkamaljot
    Hamady, Mohamad
    Xu, Xiao Yun
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2015, 22 (04) : 578 - 590
  • [4] Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Ozdemir, Baris Ata
    Chassin-Trubert, Lucien
    Sfeir, Julien
    Alric, Pierre
    Gandet, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2019, 26 (05) : 645 - 651
  • [5] Fenestrated and branched stent-grafts for thoracoabdominal, pararenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair
    Chuter, Timothy A. M.
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 20 (02) : 90 - 96
  • [6] BIFURCATED STENT-GRAFTS FOR ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - PRELIMINARY CASE-REPORTS
    CHUTER, TAM
    DONAYRE, C
    WENDT, G
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (07): : 800 - 802
  • [7] Fenestrated Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Pena, Constantino S.
    Schiro, Brian J.
    Benenati, James F.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 21 (03) : 156 - 164
  • [8] Aortomonoiliac stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Association with iliofemoral crossover grafts
    Pereira, AH
    Sanvitto, PC
    de Souza, GG
    Costa, LF
    Grudtner, MA
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2002, 9 (06) : 765 - 771
  • [9] Fenestrated-Branch Endovascular Repair After Prior Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Juszczak, Maciej
    Vezzosi, Massimo
    Nasr, Hosaam
    Claridge, Martin
    Adam, Donald J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (05) : 728 - 737
  • [10] Endovascular stent-grafts for traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Sakakibara, Y
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) : 283 - 284