Patterns of treatment and BRAF testing with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma presumed to be BRAF positive

被引:5
|
作者
Ghate, Sameer [1 ]
Ionescu-Ittu, Raluca [3 ]
Burne, Rebecca [3 ]
Ndife, Briana [1 ]
Laliberte, Francois [3 ]
Nakasato, Antonio [1 ]
Duh, Mei Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[2] Anal Grp Inc, 111 Huntington Ave,14th Floor, Boston, MA 02199 USA
[3] Grp Anal Ltee, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
BRAF testing; immune checkpoint inhibitors; metastatic melanoma; targeted therapy; OPEN-LABEL; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; POOLED ANALYSIS; IPILIMUMAB; DABRAFENIB; MULTICENTER; VEMURAFENIB; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1097/CMR.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Patients with BRAF V600 (BRAF) mutated metastatic melanoma are eligible for therapy with both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, making treatment choice a complex decision. The present study aimed to describe patterns of treatment with immunotherapy and targeted therapy and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic melanoma presumed to have BRAF mutations (BRAF+) in the years following the approval of the newer generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (2014-2016). Two large US commercial claims databases [Truven Health Analytics MarketScan and IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - USA (IQVIA RWD Adjudicated Claims - USA)] were used. Patients were presumed BRAF+ if they received at least 2 lines of therapy of which at least 1 included targeted therapy. Sequence of lines of therapy and regimens used in first (1L), second (2L), and third (3L), as well as timing of BRAF testing by sequence of therapy were described. In the Truven sample (n= 162), targeted therapy was used by 66% in 1L and by 54% in 2L, and 62% had a BRAF test; in the IQVIA RWD Adjudicated Claims - USA sample (n= 247), targeted therapy was used by 62% in 1L and by 50% in 2L, and 68% had a BRAF test. Among those with a claim for a BRAF test prior to 1L, over two-thirds were initiated on targeted therapy. These findings suggest that the rate of BRAF testing remained low in the years following the approval of BRAF-targeted regimens for metastatic disease. Given the recently approved adjuvant treatment options for stage III melanoma, improving the rates of BRAF testing becomes increasingly important. Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immunotherapy vs BRAF and MEK inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma
    Casas Hidalgo, I.
    Nieto Gomez, P.
    Rodriguez Delgado, A.
    Alvarez Sanchez, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 41 (01) : 376 - 376
  • [32] Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients: a guide and update for pathologists
    Kakavand, Hojabr
    Wilmott, James S.
    Long, Georgina V.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    PATHOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [33] Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma
    Mier, James W.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 37 (04) : 753 - 754
  • [34] New Developments in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Therapies
    Azijli, Kaamar
    Stelloo, Ellen
    Peters, Godefridus J.
    Van den Eertwegh, Alfons J. M.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (04) : 1493 - 1505
  • [35] Treatment patterns of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma
    Machado, Marina A. A.
    Moura, Cristiano S.
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Hudson, Marie
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 395 - 396
  • [36] Cardiovascular monitoring in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors
    Guglielmi, Giulia
    Sarocchi, Matteo
    Tini, Giacomo
    Schiavone, Arianna
    Toma, Matteo
    Spagnolo, Francesco
    Tanda, Enrica Teresa
    Boutros, Andrea
    Spallarossa, Paolo
    Porto, Italo
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2020, 22 (0N) : N20 - N21
  • [37] Patterns of histologic response to neoadjuvant targeted therapy in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma.
    Eroglu, Zeynep
    Khushalani, Nikhil I.
    Rich, Jeani
    Sarnaik, Amod
    Zager, Jonathan S.
    Markowitz, Joseph
    Brohl, Andrew Scott
    Sondak, Vernon K.
    Messina, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [38] Real-World Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Targeted and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Systemic Therapy in BRAF Mutation-Positive NSCLC
    Gibson, Amanda J. W.
    Pabani, Aliyah
    Dean, Michelle L.
    Martos, Guillermo
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    Navani, Vishal
    JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS, 2023, 4 (03):
  • [39] Anti-PD-(L)1 plus BRAF/MEK inhibitors (triplet therapy) after failure of immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapy in patients with advanced melanoma
    Albrecht, Lea Jessica
    Dimitriou, Florentia
    Grover, Piyush
    Hassel, Jessica C.
    Erdmann, Michael
    Forschner, Andrea
    Johnson, Douglas B.
    Varaljai, Renata
    Lodde, Georg
    Placke, Jan Malte
    Krefting, Frederik
    Zaremba, Anne
    Ugurel, Selma
    Roesch, Alexander
    Schulz, Carsten
    Berking, Carola
    Poettgen, Christoph
    Menzies, Alexander M.
    Long, Georgina V.
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Livingstone, Elisabeth
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Zimmer, Lisa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 202
  • [40] DRESS syndrome in a patient with metastatic malignant melanoma induced by targeted therapy with the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib
    Pickert, J. E.
    Mobs, C.
    Schulze-Dasbeck, M.
    Logenthiran, L.
    Gschnell, M.
    Muhlenbein, S.
    Pfutzner, W.
    Bender, A.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : E11 - E11