Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Cheng-Wen [1 ]
Li, Yan-Dong [2 ]
Tian, Hai-Tao [1 ]
Kong, Xian-Gang [1 ]
Chen, Kui [1 ]
机构
[1] Jining 1 Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Jining 272011, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Jining Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Jining 272029, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Awake Fiberoptic Intubation; Conscious Sedation; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Sufentanil; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; REMIFENTANIL; ANESTHESIA; SEVOFLURANE; INFUSION; SCALE;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.170260
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is usually performed in the management of the predicted difficult airway. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of dexmedetomidine with midazolam (DM) and sufentanil with midazolam (SM) for sedation for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Methods: Fifty patients with limited mouth opening scheduled for AFOI were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 25 per group) by a computer-generated randomization schedule. All subjects received midazolam 0.02 mg/kg as premedication and airway topical anesthesia with a modified "spray-as-you-go" technique. Group DM received dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 0.5 mu g/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25 mu g.kg(-1).h(-1), whereas Group SM received sufentanil at a loading dose of 0.2 mu g/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 mu g.kg(-1).h(-1). As necessary, since the end of the administration of the loading dose of the study drug, an additional dose of midazolam 0.5 mg at 2-min intervals was given to achieve a modified Observers' Assessment of Alertness/Sedation of 2-3. The quality of intubation conditions and adverse events were observed. Results: The scores of ease of the AFOI procedure, patient's reaction during AFOI, coughing severity, tolerance after intubation, recall of the procedure and discomfort during the procedure were comparable in both groups (z = 0.572, 0.664, 1.297, 0.467, 0.895, and 0.188, respectively, P > 0.05). Hypoxic episodes similarly occurred in the two groups, but the first partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 after intubation was higher in Group SM than that in Group DM (45.2 +/- 4.2 mmHg vs. 42.2 +/- 4.3 mmHg, t = 2.495, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both dexmedetomidine and sufentanil are effective as an adjuvant for AFOI under airway topical anesthesia combined with midazolam sedation, but respiratory depression is still a potential risk in the sufentanil regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:3143 / 3148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparative Study Using Propofol Alone Versus Propofol Combined Midazolam for Colonoscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Study
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Jung, Jae One
    Moon, Joon Ho
    Shin, Woon Geon
    Kim, Jong Pyo
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Hahn, Taeho
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Park, Choong Kee
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB190 - AB190
  • [32] Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Lidocaine Versus Intranasal Lidocaine Alone in Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation-A Randomised Clinical Study
    Kaur, Mandeep
    Kumar, Parmod
    Rekhi, Balwinder Kaur
    Cathrine, K. Priyaa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (08) : UC18 - UC22
  • [33] Evaluation of different doses of dexmedetomidine for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial and oral malignancy surgeries: A randomised, double-blind study
    Arora, Sanya
    Govardhane, Balasaheb T.
    Srinivasan, Vanchula
    Karandikar, Gayatri
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [34] Oral preanaesthetic medication for children:: double-blind randomized study of a combination of midazolam and ketamine vs midazolam or ketamine alone
    Funk, W
    Jakob, W
    Riedl, T
    Taeger, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (03) : 335 - 340
  • [35] A double-blind randomized comparison of midazolam alone and midazolam combined with ketamine for sedation of pediatric dental patients
    Roelofse, JA
    Joubert, JJD
    Roelofse, PGR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (07) : 838 - 844
  • [36] Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department
    Neville, Desiree N. W.
    Hayes, Katharina R.
    Ivan, Yaron
    McDowell, Erin R.
    Pitetti, Raymond D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (08) : 910 - 917
  • [37] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM ALONE AND MIDAZOLAM COMBINED WITH KETAMINE FOR SEDATION OF PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS
    ROELOFSE, JA
    JOUBERT, JJD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 4 - 4
  • [38] Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial
    Sachar, Hamita
    Pichetshote, Nipaporn
    Nandigam, Kavitha
    Vaidya, Keta
    Laine, Loren
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (05) : 1297 - 1303
  • [39] Fentanyl versus nalbuphine for intubating conditions during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blind comparative study
    Chaudhary, Sujata
    Chaudhary, Sachin
    Kumar, Mahendra
    Salhotra, Rashmi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) : 378 - 382
  • [40] Dexmedetomidine or midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized double blind prospective study
    Koruk, Senem
    Koruk, Irfan
    Arslan, Ayse Mizrak
    Bilgi, Murat
    Gul, Rauf
    Bozgeyik, Semsettin
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (03) : 526 - 532