Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Cheng-Wen [1 ]
Li, Yan-Dong [2 ]
Tian, Hai-Tao [1 ]
Kong, Xian-Gang [1 ]
Chen, Kui [1 ]
机构
[1] Jining 1 Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Jining 272011, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Jining Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Jining 272029, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Awake Fiberoptic Intubation; Conscious Sedation; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Sufentanil; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; REMIFENTANIL; ANESTHESIA; SEVOFLURANE; INFUSION; SCALE;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.170260
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is usually performed in the management of the predicted difficult airway. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of dexmedetomidine with midazolam (DM) and sufentanil with midazolam (SM) for sedation for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Methods: Fifty patients with limited mouth opening scheduled for AFOI were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 25 per group) by a computer-generated randomization schedule. All subjects received midazolam 0.02 mg/kg as premedication and airway topical anesthesia with a modified "spray-as-you-go" technique. Group DM received dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 0.5 mu g/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25 mu g.kg(-1).h(-1), whereas Group SM received sufentanil at a loading dose of 0.2 mu g/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 mu g.kg(-1).h(-1). As necessary, since the end of the administration of the loading dose of the study drug, an additional dose of midazolam 0.5 mg at 2-min intervals was given to achieve a modified Observers' Assessment of Alertness/Sedation of 2-3. The quality of intubation conditions and adverse events were observed. Results: The scores of ease of the AFOI procedure, patient's reaction during AFOI, coughing severity, tolerance after intubation, recall of the procedure and discomfort during the procedure were comparable in both groups (z = 0.572, 0.664, 1.297, 0.467, 0.895, and 0.188, respectively, P > 0.05). Hypoxic episodes similarly occurred in the two groups, but the first partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 after intubation was higher in Group SM than that in Group DM (45.2 +/- 4.2 mmHg vs. 42.2 +/- 4.3 mmHg, t = 2.495, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both dexmedetomidine and sufentanil are effective as an adjuvant for AFOI under airway topical anesthesia combined with midazolam sedation, but respiratory depression is still a potential risk in the sufentanil regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:3143 / 3148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study
    Li Cheng-Wen
    Li Yan-Dong
    Tian Hai-Tao
    Kong Xian-Gang
    Chen Kui
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2015, (23) : 3143 - 3148
  • [2] A comparative study of dexmedetomidine with midazolam and midazolam alone for sedation during elective awake fiberoptic intubation
    Bergese, Sergio D.
    Bender, Stephen Patrick
    McSweeney, Thomas D.
    Fernandez, Soledad
    Dzwonczyk, Roger
    Do, Kevin Sage
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2010, 22 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [3] Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway - a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial
    Ramalingam, Sivakumar
    Pappu, Ameya
    Ramachandran, Rashmi
    Kumar, Shailendra
    Trikha, Anjan
    Rewari, Vimi
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 222 - 223
  • [4] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Hu, Rong
    Liu, J. X.
    Jiang, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Rong Hu
    J. X. Liu
    Hong Jiang
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 : 211 - 217
  • [6] COMPARISON BETWEEN DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND A COMBINATION OF MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL FOR SEDATION DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED PARALLEL GROUP DOUBLE-BLINDED STUDY
    Murugesan, K.
    Rajkumar, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (42): : 5360 - 5365
  • [7] A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM (DIAZEMULS) AS SEDATION FOR FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY
    TAYLOR, RG
    JOHNSON, F
    COX, JCG
    POI, PJH
    ARNOLD, AG
    [J]. THORAX, 1987, 42 (09) : 705 - 705
  • [8] DIAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM (VERSED) IN OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY
    LEWIS, BS
    SHLIEN, RD
    WAYE, JD
    KNIGHT, RJ
    ALDOROTY, RA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (01) : 33 - 36
  • [9] DIAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM (VERSED) IN OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY
    LEWIS, B
    SHLIEN, R
    WAYE, J
    KNIGHT, R
    ALDEROTY, R
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1987, 33 (02) : 144 - 145
  • [10] Sedation During Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation With Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study
    Senoglu, Nimet
    Oksuz, Hafize
    Dogan, Zafer
    Yildiz, Huseyin
    Demirkiran, Hilmi
    Ekerbicer, Hasan
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2010, 71 (03): : 141 - 153