Modeled vs. SMOS L2 Soil Moisture in the Central Part of the Duero Basin (Spain)

被引:2
|
作者
Gumuzzio, Angela [1 ]
Sanchez, Nilda [1 ]
Martinez-Fernandez, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Ctr Hispano Luso Invest Agr, Villamayor Salamanca 37185, Spain
关键词
Soil moisture; SMOS L2; Hydrological model; Multi-scale data; IN-SITU; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_127
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The temporal evolution of three soil moisture datasets, which comprised remote sensing, in situ observations and modeled data, was analyzed. The study area is located in the central part of the Duero basin (Spain), where the long-term soil moisture monitoring network REMEDHUS is operating. The soil moisture time series of several representative stations were used as a benchmark during the period January 2010-June 2012. This dataset is compared on a daily basis to the L2 soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission in both the ascending and descending orbits. The Soil Water Balance Model-Green Ampt (SWBM-GA) has been calibrated and validated in the REMEDHUS area, and the resulting time series were also compared to the SMOS data. The overall results of the comparisons were acceptable and showed that SMOS L2 agreed better with the modeled data (average correlation coefficient, R, equal to 0.63) than it did with the observed (R = 0.48) data. Through the application of a normalization technique, the systematic differences between SMOS and the in situ or modeled datasets were significantly reduced, with Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) values in the range of 0.02-0.15 m(3) m(-)3 (average RMSD = 0.07 m(3) m(-3)). The results are closer to and sometimes better than the target accuracy of the SMOS mission (0.04 m(3) m(-3)).
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 640
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revisiting L2 pragmatic competence through implicit vs. explicit instructional framework
    Huang, Nan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] Immediate vs. delayed prompts, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
    Rassaei, Ehsan
    [J]. LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2024, 33 (03) : 649 - 672
  • [33] Investigating Correlations and the Validation of SMAP-Sentinel L2 and In Situ Soil Moisture in Thailand
    Jotisankasa, Apiniti
    Torsri, Kritanai
    Supavetch, Soravis
    Sirirodwattanakool, Kajornsak
    Thonglert, Nuttasit
    Sawangwattanaphaibun, Rati
    Faikrua, Apiwat
    Peangta, Pattarapoom
    Akaranee, Jakrapop
    Al-Yaari, Amen
    Xu, Xiaoyong
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (21)
  • [34] Multidialectal and multilingual translanguaging in L2 Arabic classrooms: teachers' beliefs vs. actual practices
    Kawafha, Hazem
    Al Masaeed, Khaled
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [35] Idealizing nativeness vs. embracing nonnativeness: A case study on L2 pronunciation teachers' identity
    Gordon, Joshua
    Barrantes-Elizondo, Lena
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [36] Traditional Study Abroad vs. ELFSA: Differences and Similarities in L2 Reading, Vocabulary, and Use
    Borras, Judith
    Llanes, Angels
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE IDENTITY AND EDUCATION, 2022,
  • [37] Effects of Massed vs. Distributed Implicit FonF on Receptive Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary Items
    Nowbakht, Mohammad
    Moinzadeh, Ahmad
    Dabaghi, Azizollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2015, 12 (03): : 115 - 147
  • [38] L2 learners' acquisition of simple vs. complex linguistic features across explicit vs. implicit instructional approaches: The mediating role of beliefs
    Karimi, Mohammad Nabi
    Abdollahi, Sara
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2022, 26 (06) : 1179 - 1201
  • [39] Expressing time through space Embodying conceptual metaphors in an L1 vs. an L2 signed language
    Nilsson, Anna-Lena
    [J]. TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETING STUDIES, 2018, 13 (01): : 6 - 26
  • [40] Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences
    Nasseri, Maryam
    Thompson, Paul
    [J]. ASSESSING WRITING, 2021, 47