Reliability of the Woodway Curve™ Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalez, Adam M. [1 ]
Wells, Adam J. [1 ]
Hoffman, Jay R. [1 ]
Stout, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
Fragala, Maren S. [1 ]
Mangine, Gerald T. [1 ]
McCormack, William P. [1 ]
Townsend, Jeremy R. [1 ]
Jajtner, Adam R. [1 ]
Emerson, Nadia S. [1 ]
Robinson, Edward H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Exercise Physiol & Wellness, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Anaerobic capacity; power; Wingate anaerobic power test; sprint speed; JUMP; VALIDITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
A curved treadmill offers a practical method of assessing anaerobic power by enabling unrestricted running motion and greater sport specificity. The purpose of this research was to determine reliability of a curved treadmill (cTM) sprint test and to compare performance measures to the traditional Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT) performed on a cycle ergometer. Thirty-two recreationally active men and women (22.4 +/- 2.8 yrs; 1.73 +/- 0.08 m; 74.2 +/- 13.2 kg) performed four familiarization trials on cTM, followed by two randomly assigned experimental trials consisting of one 30-second maximum effort on either cTM or WAnT. Each trial was separated by at least 48 hours. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), interclass correlations (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal differences (MD) were used to determine reliability of familiarization trials on cTM, and Pearson product moment correlations were calculated to compare cTM and WAnT. ANOVA results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) during the four familiarization trials. Post hoc analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the first two trials. Familiarization trials 3 and 4 showed a high reliability for each performance variable (distance: ICC2,1 = 0.969, %SEM = 2.645, p = 0.157; mean velocity: ICC2,1 = 0.969, %SEM = 2.622, p = 0.173; peak velocity: ICC2,1 = 0.966, %SEM = 3.142, p = 0.033; mean power: ICC2,1 = 0.940, %SEM = 4.140, p = 0.093; and peak power: ICC2,1 = 0.887, %SEM = 11.244, p = 0.669). Participants elicited an average peak power of 1050.4 +/- 338.5 Watts on cTM and 1031.4 +/- 349.8 Watts on WAnT. Pearson product moment coefficients indicated high correlations between peak power, mean power, and peak velocity (r = 0.75, p < 0.001; r = 0.84, p < 0.001; and r = 0.76, p < 0.001, respectively) derived from cTM and WAnT. In conclusion, results suggest that after two familiarization trials, cTM is a reliable sprint test for recreationally active men and women. In addition, there are strong relationships between cTM and WAnT in assessing anaerobic performance.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:104 / 108
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Lower Extremity Muscle Activity When Walking On A Non-motorized Treadmill
    Shaulis, Carl P.
    Anderson, Samuel I.
    Barlage, Riley A.
    McLean, Scott P.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 612 - 612
  • [22] Repeatability Of 5-km Time Trials On A Non-motorized Treadmill
    Hines, Chandon L.
    Kennedy, Emily P.
    Waldman, Hunter S.
    Heatherly, Alex J.
    Hall, Gavin W.
    O'Neal, Eric K.
    Green, Matt
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 752 - 752
  • [23] Ground Reaction Forces and Gait Parameters during Motorized and Non-Motorized Treadmill Walking and Running on the International Space Station Treadmill
    Norcross, Jason
    DeWitt, John
    Lee, Stuart M. C.
    McCleary, Frank
    Edwards, W. Brent
    Hagan, R. Donald
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S122 - S122
  • [24] Investigate The Needed Walking Ability Of Patients With Stroke For Training With Non-motorized Treadmill
    Chang, Ya Ling
    Chen, Hsing Yu
    Sung, Wen Hsu
    Chuang, Tien Yow
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 404 - 404
  • [25] Increased physiologic intensity during walking and running on a non-motorized, curved treadmill
    Smoliga, James M.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Ford, Kevin R.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2015, 16 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [26] Physiological and Perceptual Response During Maximal Graded Exercise Testing On A Motorized Vs. Non-Motorized Treadmill
    Perchinske, Roseann M.
    Wisniewski, Hannah R.
    Sweitzer, Janel K.
    Fullenkamp, Adam M.
    Laurent, C. Matthew
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 688 - 688
  • [27] The Effect of a Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill on Running Gait Length, Imbalance and Stride Angle
    Hatchett, Andrew
    Armstrong, Kaitlyn
    Parr, Brian
    Crews, Mallory
    Tant, Charlie
    SPORTS, 2018, 6 (03):
  • [28] Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
    Andre, Matthew J.
    Fry, Andrew C.
    Lane, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS, 2013, 38 : 161 - 167
  • [29] Estimated VO2max From The Rockport Walk Test On A Non-motorized Curved Treadmill
    Seneli, Rhiannon M.
    Snyder, Ann C.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 756 - 756
  • [30] Automated gait temporal-spatial assessment from non-motorized treadmill belt speed data
    Fullenkamp, Adam M.
    Laurent, C. Matthew
    Campbell, Brian M.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (01) : 141 - 145