Reliability of the Woodway Curve™ Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalez, Adam M. [1 ]
Wells, Adam J. [1 ]
Hoffman, Jay R. [1 ]
Stout, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
Fragala, Maren S. [1 ]
Mangine, Gerald T. [1 ]
McCormack, William P. [1 ]
Townsend, Jeremy R. [1 ]
Jajtner, Adam R. [1 ]
Emerson, Nadia S. [1 ]
Robinson, Edward H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Exercise Physiol & Wellness, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Anaerobic capacity; power; Wingate anaerobic power test; sprint speed; JUMP; VALIDITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
A curved treadmill offers a practical method of assessing anaerobic power by enabling unrestricted running motion and greater sport specificity. The purpose of this research was to determine reliability of a curved treadmill (cTM) sprint test and to compare performance measures to the traditional Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT) performed on a cycle ergometer. Thirty-two recreationally active men and women (22.4 +/- 2.8 yrs; 1.73 +/- 0.08 m; 74.2 +/- 13.2 kg) performed four familiarization trials on cTM, followed by two randomly assigned experimental trials consisting of one 30-second maximum effort on either cTM or WAnT. Each trial was separated by at least 48 hours. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), interclass correlations (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal differences (MD) were used to determine reliability of familiarization trials on cTM, and Pearson product moment correlations were calculated to compare cTM and WAnT. ANOVA results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) during the four familiarization trials. Post hoc analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the first two trials. Familiarization trials 3 and 4 showed a high reliability for each performance variable (distance: ICC2,1 = 0.969, %SEM = 2.645, p = 0.157; mean velocity: ICC2,1 = 0.969, %SEM = 2.622, p = 0.173; peak velocity: ICC2,1 = 0.966, %SEM = 3.142, p = 0.033; mean power: ICC2,1 = 0.940, %SEM = 4.140, p = 0.093; and peak power: ICC2,1 = 0.887, %SEM = 11.244, p = 0.669). Participants elicited an average peak power of 1050.4 +/- 338.5 Watts on cTM and 1031.4 +/- 349.8 Watts on WAnT. Pearson product moment coefficients indicated high correlations between peak power, mean power, and peak velocity (r = 0.75, p < 0.001; r = 0.84, p < 0.001; and r = 0.76, p < 0.001, respectively) derived from cTM and WAnT. In conclusion, results suggest that after two familiarization trials, cTM is a reliable sprint test for recreationally active men and women. In addition, there are strong relationships between cTM and WAnT in assessing anaerobic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 108
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Reliability Of A Non-motorized Treadmill For Assessing Anaerobic Performance
    Gonzalez, Adam M.
    Wells, Adam J.
    Hoffman, Jay R.
    Stout, Jeffrey R.
    Mangine, Gerald T.
    McCormack, William P.
    Fragala, Maren S.
    Townsend, Jeremy R.
    Jajtner, Adam R.
    Emerson, Nadia S.
    Robinson, Edward H.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 682 - 683
  • [2] Comparison Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Gait
    McLean, Scott P.
    Williams, Emma C.
    Kennedy, Kevan D.
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (10) : 81 - 81
  • [3] THE USE OF A NON-MOTORIZED TREADMILL FOR ANALYZING SPRINT PERFORMANCE
    LAKOMY, HKA
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1987, 30 (04) : 627 - 637
  • [4] The Reliability of Running Performance in a 5km Time Trial on a Non-motorized Treadmill
    Stevens, C. J.
    Hacene, J.
    Sculley, D. V.
    Taylor, L.
    Callister, R.
    Dascombe, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 36 (09) : 705 - 709
  • [5] Metabolic Cost Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Running
    Whyte, Douglas G.
    Tofari, Paul J.
    Cormack, Stuart J.
    Edwards, Robert B.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 195 - 195
  • [6] Metabolic Cost Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Running
    Whyte, Douglas G.
    Tofari, Paul J.
    Cormack, Stuart J.
    Edwards, Robert B.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 195 - 195
  • [7] Gait Kinematics And Dynamics Of Walking On A Non-motorized Treadmill Versus A Motorized Treadmill
    Van Duijn, Arie J.
    Svopa, Kaitlyn
    Dutton, Sterling
    Felton, Shawn
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2023, 55 (09) : 583 - 584
  • [8] Physiological Differences Between Motorized and Non-Motorized Treadmill Running
    Stenson, Mary
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 932 - 932
  • [9] Prediction of Belt Sag on a Non-Motorized Curved Treadmill
    Kim, Sayup
    Hyeong, Joonho
    Roh, Jongryun
    Kwon, Ohung
    Kim, Youngho
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2017, 18 (03) : 359 - 365
  • [10] Prediction of belt sag on a non-motorized curved treadmill
    Sayup Kim
    Joonho Hyeong
    Jongryun Roh
    Ohung Kwon
    Youngho Kim
    [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2017, 18 : 359 - 365