Environmental and economic life cycle evaluation of potential energy efficiency measures on Latvian fish supply chain

被引:2
|
作者
Diaz, Fabian [1 ]
Koiro, Lolita [1 ]
Romagnoli, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes Iela 12-1, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
来源
FUTURE FOODS | 2022年 / 6卷
关键词
Cold supply chain; Energy efficiency measures; Life cycle cost; Circular economy; Sidestream valorization; COLD CHAIN; FOOD WASTE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100203
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The food industry consumes a significant amount of energy, and it is responsible for 20 to 30 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, with cold supply chains absorbing about 70 percent of the energy expended in postagriculture food systems. Despite this, some gaps remain in the sector when looking toward identifying energy consumption hotspots and evaluating the impact of energy efficiency measures across the entire supply chain. This study implements an environmental Life Cycle Assessment and a Life Cycle Cost analysis to assess a Latvian fish cold supply chain and implement two energy efficiency measures in different stages. Specifically, a fish waste valorization scenario via anaerobic digestion processes, and a scenario implementing a photovoltaic system, are considered. Both strategies proved economically feasible and delivered environmental benefits at different levels than the defined baseline scenario. The energy production from fish waste showed the best economic evaluation performance, with an internal rate of return of 14.4 percent.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Software Tool for a Stochastic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing of Buildings' Energy Efficiency Measures
    Baldoni, Edoardo
    Coderoni, Silvia
    Di Giuseppe, Elisa
    D'Orazio, Marco
    Esposti, Roberto
    Maracchini, Gianluca
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [42] Analytical, Performance & Prescriptive Measures for Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainability or Energy Efficiency Projects
    Taneja, Om
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION - 2010, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 541 - 550
  • [43] The environmental evaluation of utilising geothermal energy with the life-cycle method
    Benke, Boglarka
    Patzay, Gyoergy
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 54 (02) : 63 - 69
  • [44] Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment
    Kuldip Singh Sangwan
    Kailash Choudhary
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 518 - 529
  • [45] Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    Choudhary, Kailash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (03): : 518 - 529
  • [46] Environmental life cycle impact assessment of fresh California strawberries: A full supply chain perspective
    Parajuli, Ranjan
    Matlock, Marty D.
    Thoma, Greg
    CLEANER AND RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION, 2022, 6
  • [47] A biophysical approach to allocation of life cycle environmental burdens for fluid milk supply chain analysis
    Thoma, Greg
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Wang, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2013, 31 : S41 - S49
  • [48] Environmental analysis along the supply chain of dark, milk and white chocolate: a life cycle comparison
    Bianchi, F. R.
    Moreschi, L.
    Gallo, M.
    Vesce, E.
    Del Borghi, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (04): : 807 - 821
  • [49] Sustainability on the plate: Unveiling the environmental footprint of pasta supply chain through Life Cycle Assessment
    Catellani, Eleonora
    Manfredini, Sophia
    Amico, Clarissa
    Ciccullo, Federica
    Cigolini, Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 112
  • [50] Environmental analysis along the supply chain of dark, milk and white chocolate: a life cycle comparison
    F. R. Bianchi
    L. Moreschi
    M. Gallo
    E. Vesce
    A. Del Borghi
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 807 - 821