Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation (CENSER) A Randomized Trial

被引:167
|
作者
Permpikul, Chairat [1 ]
Tongyoo, Surat [1 ]
Viarasilpa, Tanuwong [1 ]
Trainarongsakul, Thavinee [1 ]
Chakorn, Tipa [2 ]
Udompanturak, Suthipol [3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Off Res & Dev, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
septic shock; norepinephrine; resuscitation; early norepinephrine administration; sepsis with hypotension; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; SEVERE SEPSIS; BLOOD-FLOW;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Rationale: Recent retrospective evidence suggests the efficacy of early norepinephrine administration during resuscitation; however, prospective data to support this assertion are scarce. Objectives: To conduct a phase II trial evaluating the hypothesis that early low-dose norepinephrine in adults with sepsis with hypotension increases shock control by 6 hours compared with standard care. Methods: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The study enrolled 310 adults diagnosed with sepsis with hypotension. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: early norepinephrine (n = 155) and standard treatment (n = 155). The primary outcome was shock control rate (defined as achievement of mean arterial blood pressure >= 65mm Hg, with urine flow >= 0.5 ml/kg/h for 2 consecutive hours, or decreased serum lactate >= 10% from baseline) by 6 hours after diagnosis. Measurements and Main Results: The patients in both groups were well matched in background characteristics and disease severity. Median time from emergency room arrival to norepinephrine administration was significantly shorter in the early norepinephrine group (93 vs. 192 min; P < 0.001). Shock control rate by 6 hours was significantly higher in the early norepinephrine group (118/155 [76.1%] vs. 75/155 [48.4%]; P < 0.001). The 28-day mortality was not different between groups: 24/155 (15.5%) in the early norepinephrine group versus 34/155 (21.9%) in the standard treatment group (P= 0.15). The early norepinephrine group was associated with lower incidences of cardiogenic pulmonary edema (22/155 [14.4%] vs. 43/155 [27.7%]; P = 0.004) and new-onset arrhythmia (17/155 [11%] vs. 31/155 [20%]; P= 0.03). Conclusions: Early norepinephrine was significantly associated with increased shock control by 6 hours. Further studies are needed before this approach is introduced in clinical resuscitation practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1105
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung ultrasound–guided fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock: A randomized controlled trial
    Dabin Huang
    Chuming You
    Xiaowei Mai
    Lin Li
    Qiong Meng
    Zhenyu Liang
    [J]. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2024, 183 : 1255 - 1263
  • [22] A Comparison of Initial Monotherapy with Norepinephrine Versus Vasopressin for Resuscitation in Septic Shock
    Daley, Mitchell J.
    Lat, Ishaq
    Mieure, Katherine D.
    Jennings, Heath R.
    Hall, Jesse B.
    Kress, John P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [23] Targeting the microcirculation in resuscitation of patients with septic shock: fluid is superior to norepinephrine
    J Xu
    Y Yang
    H Qiu
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [24] Changes of endothelial glycocalyx and effect of fluid resuscitation combined with norepinephrine on endothelial glycocalyx in early septic shock
    Wu, Xinhui
    Hu, Zhenjie
    Yin, Yanling
    Li, Yong
    Zhu, Guijun
    Yu, Bin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (02): : 1343 - 1351
  • [25] A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock
    Yealy, Donald M.
    Kellum, John A.
    Huang, David T.
    Barnato, Amber E.
    Weissfeld, Lisa A.
    Pike, Francis
    Terndrup, Thomas
    Wang, Henry E.
    Hou, Peter C.
    LoVecchio, Frank
    Filbin, Michael R.
    Shapiro, Nathan I.
    Angus, Derek C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (18): : 1683 - 1693
  • [26] Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial
    Andrea Morelli
    Christian Ertmer
    Sebastian Rehberg
    Matthias Lange
    Alessandra Orecchioni
    Amalia Laderchi
    Alessandra Bachetoni
    Mariadomenica D'Alessandro
    Hugo Van Aken
    Paolo Pietropaoli
    Martin Westphal
    [J]. Critical Care, 12
  • [27] Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial
    Morelli, Andrea
    Ertmer, Christian
    Rehberg, Sebastian
    Lange, Matthias
    Orecchioni, Alessandra
    Laderchi, Amalia
    Bachetoni, Alessandra
    D'Alessandro, Mariadomenica
    Van Aken, Hugo
    Pietropaoli, Paolo
    Westphal, Martin
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 12 (06):
  • [28] Evidence for a personalized early start of norepinephrine in septic shock
    Monnet, Xavier
    Lai, Christopher
    Ospina-Tascon, Gustavo
    De Backer, Daniel
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [29] Evidence for a personalized early start of norepinephrine in septic shock
    Xavier Monnet
    Christopher Lai
    Gustavo Ospina-Tascon
    Daniel De Backer
    [J]. Critical Care, 27
  • [30] Norepinephrine in septic shock
    Hernandez, Glenn
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    Bakker, Jan
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 45 (05) : 687 - 689