Private Landowner Interest in Market-Based Incentive Programs for Endangered Species Habitat Conservation

被引:17
|
作者
Rodriguez, Shari L. [1 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [1 ]
Cubbage, Frederick W. [2 ]
Sills, Erin O. [2 ]
Bondell, Howard D. [3 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2012年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
contracts; easements; endangered species; market-based incentives; North Carolina; participation; private land; recovery credit system;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.159
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
More than 75% of endangered species in the United States rely on private lands for habitat. Although this habitat has long been regulated under the Endangered Species Act, there is now broad agreement that economic incentives are also needed for effective protection on private land. Many different mechanisms for incentive programs have been proposed and tested. For example, recovery credit systems use term-duration market-based contracts to engage landowners in endangered species conservation. We examined how market-mechanism design influences interest in endangered species habitat conservation using a survey of North Carolina Farm Bureau county advisory board members in 93 of the 100 North Carolina counties (n = 735) in 2009. Respondents preferred contracts (57% were interested) over easements (39% were interested). Endangered species conservation ranked low in importance relative to other conservation issues, but 45% of respondents were interested in contracts to conserve endangered species habitat on their property. The preferred contract duration was 10 years, and respondents preferred state-and agricultural-related organizations over federal and wildlife conservation-related organizations for managing contracts. Younger respondents, respondents who had previously participated in conservation programs, respondents who perceived endangered species conservation as important, and respondents who had lower property-rights orientation scores, were most likely to be interested in contracts to restore and maintain endangered species habitat on their lands. Our results suggest that market mechanisms could drive down costs and drive up durations for endangered species habitat conservation contracts. Further, term contracts may prove critical for endangered species conservation efforts that require high levels of landowner support and spatial flexibility within relatively short-time frames. (C) 2012 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 476
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Market-Based Incentives and Private Ownership of Wildlife to Remedy Shortfalls in Government Funding for Conservation
    Wilson, George R.
    Hayward, Matt W.
    Wilson, Charlie
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 485 - 492
  • [22] Do habitat conservation plans protect endangered species?
    Shilling, F
    SCIENCE, 1997, 276 (5319) : 1662 - 1663
  • [24] Habitat Conservation Banking: Profiting from Endangered Species
    Hay, Derald J.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2010, 108 (01) : 51 - 51
  • [25] THOUGHTS AND THEORY ON INCENTIVE-BASED ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION IN THE UNITED-STATES
    HEINEN, JT
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1995, 23 (03): : 338 - 345
  • [26] Science of conservation planning: habitat conservation under the endangered species act
    Noss, R.F.
    O'Connell, M.A.
    Murphy, D.D.
    Ralls, K.
    Forest Science, 1998, 44 (04):
  • [27] Investigating how relational values influence landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program
    Messick, Jared A.
    Serenari, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (06) : 1263 - 1281
  • [28] Smart spatial incentives for market-based conservation
    Hartig, Florian
    Drechsler, Martin
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (04) : 779 - 788
  • [29] Market-based interest rates: Deterministic volatility case
    Lu, GB
    Hu, QY
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2003, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2658 : 28 - 33
  • [30] Strengths and shortcomings of habitat exchange programs for species conservation
    Davis, Kristin P.
    Heinrichs, Julie
    Fleishman, Erica
    Iranah, Pricila
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Berger, Joel
    Pejchar, Liba
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2022, 15 (02):