A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process

被引:56
|
作者
Wang, Ying-Ming [1 ,2 ]
Chin, Kwai-Sang [2 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Inst Soft Sci, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon Tong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; DEAHP; Group decision making; Multiple criteria decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.049
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The DEAHP method for weight deviation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been found flawed and sometimes produces counterintuitive priority vectors for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices, which makes its application very restrictive. This paper proposes a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) method for priority determination in the AHP and extends it to the group AHP situation. In this new DEA methodology, two specially constructed DEA models that differ from the DEAHP model are used to derive the best local priorities from a pairwise comparison matrix or a group of pairwise comparison matrices no matter whether they are perfectly consistent or inconsistent. The new DEA method produces true weights for perfectly consistent pairwise comparison matrices and the best local priorities that are logical and consistent with decision makers (DMs)' subjective judgments for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices. In hierarchical structures, the new DEA method utilizes the simple additive weighting (SAW) method for aggregation of the best local priorities without the need of normalization. Numerical examples are examined throughout the paper to show the advantages of the new DEA methodology and its potential applications in both the AHP and group decision making. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 250
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process by hesitant fuzzy numbers
    Ranjbar, Mahdi
    Effati, Sohrab
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [22] Group Decision Making in Higher Education Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Matthew J. Liberatore
    Robert L. Nydick
    [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1997, 38 : 593 - 614
  • [23] An Alternate Method of Deriving Priorities and Related Inferences for Group Decision Making in Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Basak, Indrani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (5-6) : 279 - 287
  • [24] A note on "A new approach for weight derivation using data envelopment analysis in the analytic hierarchy process"
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Luo, Ying
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2012, 56 (3-4) : 49 - 55
  • [25] Decision making analysis of the teaching effectiveness evaluation based on the analytic hierarchy process method
    Wang, Guo-Sheng
    Xu, Ke-Hu
    Lv, Qiang
    [J]. DESIGN, MANUFACTURING AND MECHATRONICS (ICDMM 2015), 2016, : 1488 - 1494
  • [26] ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR SPATIAL DECISION MAKING
    Ozturk, Derya
    Batuk, Fatmagul
    [J]. SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2010, 28 (02): : 124 - 137
  • [27] An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Group Decision Making Methodology for Imprecise Preferences
    Lee, Kathleen
    Jalao, Eugene Rex
    [J]. FUZZY SYSTEMS AND DATA MINING III (FSDM 2017), 2017, 299 : 203 - 220
  • [28] Supplier evaluation based on synthesis method of principal component analysis, data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process
    Fan, Chen
    Wang, Xiaoli
    [J]. Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2012, 40 (12): : 1899 - 1904
  • [29] Clusters in a group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process
    Zahir, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 112 (03) : 620 - 634
  • [30] Analytic Hierarchy Process in group decision making: Much ado about nothing
    Aronson, JE
    Dennis, AR
    Hilmer, KM
    Stam, A
    [J]. ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDING OF THE AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1997, : 593 - 595