Evaluation of Low-Level Winds from WRF Model that Driven by Different Background Field Data with Applications to Wind Energy Forecasting

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Zhaoming [2 ]
Jin, Shuanglong [1 ]
Wang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Wang, Shigong [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Atmospher Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Meteorol Bur Qinghai Prov, Meteorol Observ Qinghai Prov, Xining 810001, Qinghai, Peoples R China
关键词
WRF model; wind simulation; background field; FNL data; GFS data;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.608-609.692
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the large-scale and rapid development of wind power in China, the accuracy of wind power prediction is asked for higher. So how to improve the accuracy of numerical weather prediction models which forecast wind has become an important and critical issue. That the accuracy of numerical prediction models as well as the bias of background data is main cause why generate simulated error. This paper attempted to employ the advanced WRF model to simulate the low-level wind in arid region of northwest China, and then evaluated the impact size that using FNL and GFS background data. The results show that using FNL and GFS data simulated wind is very close. It is found that simulation results driven by the FNL assimilated data are worse sometimes. Consequently, we can conclude that FNL assimilated data as well as GFS forecast data are close and the assimilation of FNL data is still need to improvement in northwest China.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of piezoelectret foam in a multilayer stack configuration for low-level vibration energy harvesting applications
    Ray, Chase A.
    Anton, Steven R.
    ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SMART STRUCTURES AND INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 2015, 2015, 9431
  • [22] The statistical prediction of offshore winds from land-based data for wind-energy applications
    Walmsley, JL
    Barthelmie, RJ
    Burrows, WR
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2001, 101 (03) : 409 - 433
  • [23] The Statistical Prediction Of Offshore Winds From Land-Based Data For Wind-Energy Applications
    John L. Walmsley
    Rebecca J. Barthelmie
    William R. Burrows
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2001, 101 : 409 - 433
  • [24] Climatology of the Iberia coastal low-level wind jet: weather research forecasting model high-resolution results
    Soares, Pedro M. M.
    Cardoso, Rita M.
    Semedo, Alvaro
    Chinita, Maria J.
    Ranjha, Raza
    TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2014, 66
  • [25] Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model under Sea Breeze and Low-Level Jet Conditions in the New York Bight: Importance to Offshore Wind Energy
    Mccabe, Elizabeth j.
    Freedman, Jeffrey m.
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2025, 40 (03) : 425 - 450
  • [26] Tropical cyclone low-level wind speed, shear, and veer: sensitivity to the boundary layer parametrization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model
    Muller, Sara
    Larsen, Xiaoli Guo
    Verelst, David Robert
    WIND ENERGY SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (05) : 1153 - 1171
  • [27] Evaluation of Wind Forecasts and Observation Impacts from Variational and Ensemble Data Assimilation for Wind Energy Applications
    Ancell, Brian C.
    Kashawlic, Erin
    Schroeder, John L.
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2015, 143 (08) : 3230 - 3245
  • [28] Investigation of boundary-layer wind predictions during nocturnal low-level jet events using the Weather Research and Forecasting model
    Mirocha, J. D.
    Simpson, M. D.
    Fast, J. D.
    Berg, L. K.
    Baskett, R. L.
    WIND ENERGY, 2016, 19 (04) : 739 - 762
  • [29] A comparison of low-level wind profiles from Mode-S EHS data with ground-based remote sensing data
    Livius Buzdugan
    Octavian Paul Bugeac
    Sabina Stefan
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2021, 133 : 1455 - 1468
  • [30] A comparison of low-level wind profiles from Mode-S EHS data with ground-based remote sensing data
    Buzdugan, Livius
    Bugeac, Octavian Paul
    Stefan, Sabina
    METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2021, 133 (05) : 1455 - 1468